«

In article <io31l.6811$>,
Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote:

> I did get a nice calm break in the clouds:
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3194/...738f9a7a_o.jpg
> flickr page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/3106171957/
>
> Nikon D200, Tokina 300mm f/2.8 + 2x TC + 1.4x TC, 1/2.5 seconds, f/32,
> ISO 100, reduced 60%


Good one, nice resolution of the craters- rare when so full. I like that
lens and it's versatility. (Are you sure 1/2.5 sec is correct? The
flickr page says 1/400.)

Here is mine from perigree, but still low in the sky:
http://www.netaxs.com/~mhmyers/d80/DSC_14049w.jpg

D80, 1000mm (Fieldscope 82), f/13, 1/250, ISO 200.
--
m-m
http://www.mhmyers.com

M-M wrote:
> In article <io31l.6811$>,
> Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote:
>
>> I did get a nice calm break in the clouds:
>> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3194/...738f9a7a_o.jpg
>> flickr page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/3106171957/
>>
>> Nikon D200, Tokina 300mm f/2.8 + 2x TC + 1.4x TC, 1/2.5 seconds, f/32,
>> ISO 100, reduced 60%
>
>
> Good one, nice resolution of the craters- rare when so full. I like that
> lens and it's versatility. (Are you sure 1/2.5 sec is correct? The
> flickr page says 1/400.)

I swapped it out for a better shot at 5:30 AM, the air was still then. I
didn't notice ISO was set to 1000.


> Here is mine from perigree, but still low in the sky:
> http://www.netaxs.com/~mhmyers/d80/DSC_14049w.jpg
>
> D80, 1000mm (Fieldscope 82), f/13, 1/250, ISO 200.


--
Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com

all google groups messages filtered due to spam