Many here say that handling the canera before you buy, it's a good idea to
get a feel for the camera, while I agree with this, is it as valid as it
sounds surely hands can adapt to a new camera.
Maybe the old way of holding your favoutire camera could be improved with a
newly shaped camera. i.e many millennia ago my choice in camera was a
Praktica L [1]
The shutter realese at about 45 degree angle on the front of the camera,
my second camera was a Praktica VLC2 then a Praktica EE2. All of which had
the shutter release
in the same place, then I went 'up market' and brought a Canon A1 whose
shutter release
was on the top like 99.99% of cameras are. I didn;t have any great problems
adapting.
Recently I decided that my canon S70 was a bit old and upgraded to a canon
G10,
most things felt different the shape of the camera the way to hold it, menu
functions etc..
but within a few hours if not less I'd gotten used to it and now prefer it.
So just how valid is the idea of handling a camera before buying ?
Of course this goes for both P&S, DSLRs and anything else you can use to
take photos with.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/whiskydave
Picture of cat in a pub taken with canon G10 at 1600 iso.
Take into account the cat was behind me, and that I turned around everytime
there
was a arh look at the cute kitty. These pictures won't win a quality
competition obviously,
but that isn't why I brought my camera or took the photos, sure DSLRers are
right
I should have used a camera with a better sensor and perhaps set up studio
lights,
but I really wouldn;t take that sort of kit to a pub in the east end of
London and if I did
what's the betting the cat would have 'pussed' off long before I was ready
to photograph it...

These are the sort of reason I chose a P&S over a DSLR, this time.
NB
No beer was spilt in the taking of these 3 photos.
[1] No batteries, totally manual, no meter, you even had to use a lever to
advance to the next frame !