Sanny wrote:
>> I get a lot confused as many times I use Java code in C++ and C++ code
>> in Java.
>>
>> So I have descided to only work in one Language.
Joshua Cranmer wrote:
> Poor choice. Most employers would rather employ the programmer who can
> utilize multiple programming languages over one who will choose to use
> but a single language.
Real programmers can do FORTRAN programming in any language.
Sanny wrote:
>> What language should I master. I just want to know who gets higher
>> salary a Java Programmer or a C++ Programmer?
Joshua Cranmer wrote:
> Any difference in salary between the two would be dwarfed by other
> factors, such as seniority, etc.
Literacy, ...
> In other words, statistically speaking, neither.
Do you have evidence for those statistics?
> If you want to try for the big bucks, I hear COBOL is coming back in vogue.
Never went out of vogue.
Sanny wrote:
>> Because Learning both creates confusions So I have to Choose the best
>> among them.
If you are applying for jobs where English is a relevant skill, you will
improve your earning power by increasing your mastery of that language.
Non-programming skills often count for more than one's technical abilities
when climbing the corporate rungs.
Some might look at your random capitalization of different words in English
and wonder if you are sensitive to case sensitivity in Java. It is a shame,
perhaps, that your command of English might block someone's ability to
perceive your command of programming, but that is a reality in the work world.
Joshua Cranmer wrote:
> There is no "best" language. For the most part, languages are
> fundamentally incomparable. Every single programming language has its
> strengths and weaknesses; the goal is to match up a programming language
> to the task.
Which is exactly what makes Java the best programming language.

for those who insist on explicit irony markers.
Sanny wrote:
>> Whose future is better a Java Programmer or a C++ Programmer? What
>> else should I learn for a good Career. Should I learn C# which is very
>> easy?
You should, but it isn't easy.
Joshua Cranmer wrote:
> Ideally, you should be well-rounded as a programmer. This means you
> should be able to code in C/C++ and Java. You'll probably want some
> functional languages under your belt; Python and Perl are two good
> dynamic programming languages to tackle, although Ruby seems to be the
> next "hip" language. The list goes on.
Sanny wrote:
>> Experts in fields, Please Advice.
Joshua Cranmer wrote:
> Another piece of advice would be to brush up on rules of punctuation,
> capitalization, and grammar in general.
This is not parochialism, but a necessity when one is forced to communicate in
any language. It is vitally necessary in written communications; face to
face, people will forgive accents and unusual constructions, but in written
communication there is little tolerance for fundamental errors, and less
reason for there to be any.
--
Lew