On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:08:35 -0500, "WeReo_ScoTTy"
<> wrote:
>http://www.californiajam1974.com/
>
>This guy claims to have "the highest image and sound quality to date"
>however most know that not to be the case. It's 'good' quality video and the
>sound is crummy at best. So how could it be "the highest image and sound
>quality to date" at the same time? It makes no sense to me.
>
>I guess this is their way of "revolting" against me and my California Jam
>wereo? Nice picture, guy!
>
Well anything posted to youtube is gonna lose it's "quality".
As Flash never did have "quality" to it.
I mean that's kind of like comparing 70mm to super8.
Now that aerial photo did remind me why I didn't specially care for
the "jam". The stage was set to low so people way way way in the back
could only see other heads.
If I wanted to use the outhouse, I'd have to wade by 500 people. Then
wade back. Woodstock was better and still is.