Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > Python > Will Python 3 be "stackless"?

Reply
Thread Tools

Will Python 3 be "stackless"?

 
 
Phillip B Oldham
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-23-2008
Will Python 3 be "stackless"? Or, rather, will it have any features
similar to stackless' microthreads and channels?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Chris Rebert
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-23-2008
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Phillip B Oldham
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Will Python 3 be "stackless"? Or, rather, will it have any features
> similar to stackless' microthreads and channels?
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>


No, it will definitely not. But it does have the new multiprocessing
module: http://docs.python.org/library/multi...ultiprocessing

Cheers,
Chris
--
Follow the path of the Iguana...
http://rebertia.com
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Phillip B Oldham
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-23-2008
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> No, it will definitely not.


>From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of

context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this
correct? And if so, why?

--
Phillip B Oldham
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/(E-Mail Removed)
+44 (0) 7525 01 09 01
 
Reply With Quote
 
Diez B. Roggisch
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-23-2008
Phillip B Oldham schrieb:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> No, it will definitely not.

>
>>From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of

> context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this
> correct? And if so, why?


You got the wrong impression. It's not frowned upon. It just is a lot of
extra effort to implemnt & thus makes the development of "normal"
features more complex.

Diez
 
Reply With Quote
 
Terry Reedy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-24-2008
Phillip B Oldham wrote:
> Will Python 3 be ...


The features of Python 3.0 are fixed; there are just a few remaining
bugs to fix before the final release. Download the release candidate or
look at the online manual at
http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/

 
Reply With Quote
 
davy zhang
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-24-2008
multiprocessing is good enough for now,

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Diez B. Roggisch <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Phillip B Oldham schrieb:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>
>>> No, it will definitely not.

>>
>>> From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of

>>
>> context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this
>> correct? And if so, why?

>
> You got the wrong impression. It's not frowned upon. It just is a lot of
> extra effort to implemnt & thus makes the development of "normal" features
> more complex.
>
> Diez
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] [RELEASED] Python 3.2 rc 1 R. David Murray Python 0 01-17-2011 02:23 PM
Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] [RELEASED] Python 3.2 rc 1 Senthil Kumaran Python 0 01-17-2011 10:31 AM
Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] RELEASED Python 2.6a1 and 3.0a3 Martin v. L÷wis Python 0 03-01-2008 10:51 PM
Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] RELEASED Python 2.6a1 and 3.0a3 Paul Moore Python 0 03-01-2008 10:39 PM
Searching comp.lang.python/python-list@python.org (was: UTF-8) skip@pobox.com Python 0 03-10-2007 02:50 PM



Advertisments