Re: YOUTUBE: Howard Stern goes to Harlem to prove blacks only like Obama because he is black.

On 21 Oct 2008 13:16:14 GMT, BlueBuyYoo <> wrote:

>In <> UltimatePatriot <> writes:
>
>>On 21 Oct 2008 04:27:51 GMT, BlueBuyYoo <> wrote:
>
>>>In 1956, the national debt was $200B. (Korea)
>>>In 1972, the national debt was $400B. (Viet Nam)
>>>During the Gulf War, the debt rose from $3.2T to $4.8T under Bush Sr.
>>>During Clinton's time, the debt rose from $3.2 to 6.3T.
>>>GWB has upped the ante to over $11T.
>>>
>>>Seems that the costs of Korea and Viet Nam are a pittance compared
>>>to what is thrown around today. Like the $700B gift to the poor banks
>>>that were too stupid to run their businesses responsibly.
>>>
>>>Wars have been fought throught the last 50 years. No president has
>>>managed to spend more and **** things up more than GWB.
>
>
>> The national debt, and the debt paid down against a war are two
>>entirely different animals, idiot.
>
>Really? So the cost of wars do not factor into the national debt?

NO, DIPSHIT. DO SOME MATH. THE NATIONAL DEBT IS NOT SOLELY COMPRISED
OF BY THE WAR DEBTS.

>My God, your enlightenment is simply dazzling.

Your blatant, dopey **** blindness means I will be ignoring the
stupidity that is the retarded bitch that is you. Have a nice life,
dipshit.

UltimatePatriot

UltimatePatriot <> wrote:

> On 21 Oct 2008 13:16:14 GMT, BlueBuyYoo <> wrote:
>
> >In <> UltimatePatriot
> ><> writes:
> >
> >>On 21 Oct 2008 04:27:51 GMT, BlueBuyYoo <> wrote:
> >
> >>>In 1956, the national debt was $200B. (Korea) In 1972, the national
> >>>debt was $400B. (Viet Nam) During the Gulf War, the debt rose from
> >>>$3.2T to $4.8T under Bush Sr. During Clinton's time, the debt rose from
> >>>$3.2 to 6.3T. GWB has upped the ante to over $11T.
> >>>
> >>>Seems that the costs of Korea and Viet Nam are a pittance compared to
> >>>what is thrown around today. Like the $700B gift to the poor banks
> >>>that were too stupid to run their businesses responsibly.
> >>>
> >>>Wars have been fought throught the last 50 years. No president has
> >>>managed to spend more and **** things up more than GWB.
> >
> >
> >> The national debt, and the debt paid down against a war are two
> >>entirely different animals, idiot.
> >
> >Really? So the cost of wars do not factor into the national debt?
>
> NO, DIPSHIT. DO SOME MATH. THE NATIONAL DEBT IS NOT SOLELY COMPRISED
> OF BY THE WAR DEBTS.

That's correct. However, in your previous post, you stated that they
were "two entirely different animals". Debt is debt. Whether it is
brought about by war, corruption, purchase of goods and services is
totally irrelevant.

Once again, make up your mind.

>
> >My God, your enlightenment is simply dazzling.
>
> Your blatant, dopey **** blindness means I will be ignoring the
> stupidity that is the retarded bitch that is you. Have a nice life,
> dipshit.

Ahh, the crushing blow. Typical schoolyard mentality.

Hey, say goodbye to your little friends for me!

BlueBuyYoo