«

So far so good. Everything seems to just work. Hotmail had a bitch
that it didn't recognise it but works anyway.

It seems very small, light and fast.

On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:29:36 +1200, in message <>,
OZZY Boy wrote:

> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 21:43:24 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <> wrote:
>
> >So far so good. Everything seems to just work. Hotmail had a bitch
> >that it didn't recognise it but works anyway.
> >
> >It seems very small, light and fast.
>
>
> Have a Read
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10030522-56.html


Have another read...
http://www.computerworld.com/action/...icleId=9114059

|***Google said today that it would remove one section of the end-user
|***licensing agreement that gave the company "a perpetual, irrevocable,
|***worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce,
|***adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display
|***and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or
|***through" the new browser.

On Sep 3, 4:43*pm, JohnO <johno1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So far so good. Everything seems to just work. Hotmail had a bitch
> that it didn't recognise it but works anyway.
>
> It seems very small, light and fast.

I have tried it out at work today
Seems rather buggy, fails to load images completely a lot of the time.
For instance the masthead image on the Arts and Letters Daily page
www.aldaily.com doesn't load. And refreshing the page doesn't work -
still get all these partial images. Rendering of some pages is a bit
non-standard too.

Sometimes the pages themselves just dont load either - get part of the
way then "stick". Viewing the source revals that it literally has
stopped part way down the page. No amount of refreshing fixes that
either. Same pages load perfectly with IE and Firefox

That said, it is only a beta, and does seem small light and fast. Will
be great when the bugs are sorted. But its back to Firefox 3 for me
for now

Regards
Peter Jenkins
see http://www.sensiblesentencing.org.nz