«

On 2 set, 22:31, vipps...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 3, 4:26 am, jamaj <jama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2 set, 22:19, vipps...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 3, 4:11 am, vipps...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > On Sep 3, 4:02 am, jamaj <jama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> No they did not.
>

But they are working in my machine!!! Maybe a bug of gcc... I'm
wasting my time with you. Thanks a lot...

The real program i'm building is now working, and what is important
for me.

Thanks Ian Collins...
Regards,

jamaj

On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 18:19:06 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

>On Sep 3, 4:11 am, vipps...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sep 3, 4:02 am, jamaj <jama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>Ah yes, also there's a memory leak, since you never free *p.
>So add a free(*p); after the last printf, and then add a return 0;

In main, *p is a double. You meant
free(p);

--
Remove del for email

On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 18:49:09 -0700 (PDT), jamaj <>
wrote:

>On 2 set, 22:31, vipps...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sep 3, 4:26 am, jamaj <jama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 2 set, 22:19, vipps...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > > On Sep 3, 4:11 am, vipps...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> > > > On Sep 3, 4:02 am, jamaj <jama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> No they did not.
>>
>
>But they are working in my machine!!! Maybe a bug of gcc... I'm
>wasting my time with you. Thanks a lot...
>

It is possible you are wasting your time but if so it is because you
are learning bad habits and rejecting efforts to correct them.

>The real program i'm building is now working, and what is important
>for me.

Refusing to correct undefined behavior just because the program
appears to work is a recipe for disaster.

--
Remove del for email

On Sep 3, 6:35 am, Barry Schwarz <schwa...@dqel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 18:19:06 -0700 (PDT), vipps...@gmail.com wrote:
> >On Sep 3, 4:11 am, vipps...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Sep 3, 4:02 am, jamaj <jama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ><snip>
>
> >Ah yes, also there's a memory leak, since you never free *p.
> >So add a free(*p); after the last printf, and then add a return 0;
>
> In main, *p is a double. You meant
> free(p);

Right, thanks for that correction.