I should note that I've done this (created my own
extension, not setup something for .html) to handle .asp
files, and I haven't had any problems.
So it will be interesting to see if somebody tries this
for .aspx, but I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work.
Cheers,
Jeremy
>-----Original Message-----
>Sorry, but I personally won't try it because I don't have
>an environment where I would want to test this out (and I
>wouldn't want to risk screwing anything up with .html
>files because if you can get to .html files you know IIS
>is working).
>
>However, if somebody would like to try this and not use
>an .html extension... Create (make up) a brand new file
>extension (maybe have files called mypage.irule, as
>opposed to mypage.aspx), add of the info from my previous
>post in IIS and try it out.
>
>At least this way you won't risk the possibility of
>screwing up anything with .html files.
>
>And please, if somebody does try this post something in
>this newsgroup to let us know if it works.
>
>Thanks,
>Jeremy
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>If you try it can you please let us know
>>
>>"Jeremy" <> wrote in message
>>news:050b01c369b5$9ce7cd60$...
>>> Well in the IIS Application Configuration there is no
>>> entry in the Application Mappings for a .htm file type.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure, but I would guess that if you added
a .htm
>>> file type, set the executable path to the ASP.NET ISAPI
>>> DLL, and set the Verbs to be the same as that of
>a .aspx
>>> file (GET,HEAD,POST,DEBUG) you might get it to work.
>>>
>>> Good Luck,
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >No, there is an ISAPI filter that only process those
>>> files with the correct
>>> >file extension... if you rename it, it won't be
>processed
>>> correctly..
>>> >
>>> >"Bruce W...1" <> wrote in
>message
>>> >news:...
>>> >> Would the code-behind and all ASP.NET functionality
>>> still work if the
>>> >> .aspx files had instead .htm extensions? I suppose
>it
>>> boils down to
>>> >> whether the page directives would still work.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks for your help.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >.
>>> >
>>
>>
>>.
>>
>.
>
|
Similar Threads
