variable initialization order

brickanna

Junior Member

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 1

08-20-2008

Consider:

std::map<int, int> m;
for(std::map<int, int>::iterator a=m.begin(), b=a; ........

Does the standard guarantee that b gets initialized after a?
Does the answer change for an ordinary definition list such as
int a=3, b=a; ?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Static member variable initialization order	aakash	C++	2	04-23-2011 06:13 PM
global variable vs static member initialization order	n.torrey.pines@gmail.com	C++	10	03-15-2007 02:21 PM
Initialization of non-integral type in initialization list	anongroupaccount@googlemail.com	C++	6	12-11-2005 09:51 PM
Initialization via ctor vs. initialization via assignment	Matthias Kaeppler	C++	2	07-18-2005 04:25 PM
Default Initialization Vs. Value Initialization	JKop	C++	10	09-22-2004 07:26 PM