«

On Jul 30, 9:47*pm, Natar...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jul 30, 1:43 pm, "jameshanle...@yahoo.co.uk"
>
>
>
>
>
> <jameshanle...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Jul 30, 8:58 pm, Natar...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 30, 11:23 am, "jameshanle...@yahoo.co.uk"
>
> > > <jameshanle...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > On 29 Jul, 20:28, Natar...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > <snip>
>
> > > > > lol. hahaha kalm down please. You make it seem like you're a computer
> > > > > genius which I know you're not.
>
> > > > depends who you ask. But those people would say you were a computer
> > > > genius too.
>
> > > > I wouldn't say I know more than you.. You may well know alot more than
> > > > me.
>
> > > > But you very clearly said things that were illogical, by saying and
> > > > repeating a faulty pseudo-technical expression that was innaccurate
> > > > and misleading.
>
> > > > > Ok I said drive instead of partition.
> > > > > Kill me. That really didn't take away from my solution. And whether he
> > > > > has 1, 2, or 3 partitions is relevant to his question. Having only 1
> > > > > partition means you cant partition it from that partition. Which is
> > > > > what I thought he was doing. Since he has 3 partitions he can format
> > > > > the other 2 but not the one hes booted on. Please tell me how that was
> > > > > not relevant to his question. I did admit to missing that piece of
> > > > > info. The fact that I said drive instead of partitioned is irrelevant.
> > > > > My solution will still work will it not?-
>
> > > > Of course, it will work.
>
> > > > You obviously didn't understand what I wrote.
>
> > > > Your solution was/is relevant to his problem. And it solves it.
>
> > > > My criticism of what you said, holds true regardless of how many
> > > > partitions the OP has. *That is why your excuse that you hadn't read
> > > > all of what the OP wrote, is irrelevant. *I hadn't read it either..
> > > > It's irrelevant to the mistake you made. In your case it was worse
> > > > than a mistake. You knowingly said things that were technically wrong.
>
> > > > ps: Your spelling is wrong too. Often putting a K when it should be a
> > > > C.
>
> > > hahaha, I know, I spell c-words with a K all the time. My online
> > > gaming name is Ser'Ver Kode as apposed to Code. But as long as the
> > > asker got correct solutions is really all that matters right? If my
> > > text was "inaccurate or misleading" it was done unintentionally, and
> > > I'm sorry to the people who were mislead by it. All I was trying to do
> > > was help someone with something that I had problems with some time
> > > ago.-
>
> > it does matter that a computer newsgroup has a technical community
> > that can pool their knowledge together. *giving alternative solutions
> > to problems.. This information can then be searched..
>
> > It's far more than just techies and ignoramouses asking questions and
> > getting help and getting their problem solved.
> > They should get their problem solved. But it is solved by a technical
> > community which gains alot of knowledge from the shared knowledge of
> > the technical community.
>
> > If somebody provides information that works but is technically
> > incorrect, then it's damaging , and hopefully somebody corrects
> > it.
>
> > (The following is not the situation here, but, there may be a problem
> > of somebody continuing to post garbage, and it's not feasible to keep
> > replying and correcting them. But hopefully with a few replies
> > pointing it out and that they're an idiot, serious people will know
> > from their searches, and they won't take them seriously). *I have seen
> > extreme cases where somebody has caused so much damage, that
> > justifiably, somebody else compiled a list of their crimes. Made a
> > post of it, and just repied to their posts pointing out that thread.
> > So people would be warned).
>
> "If somebody provides information that works but is technically
> incorrect, then it's damaging , and hopefully somebody corrects
> it."
>
> -- I see what you are saying. Thanks for correcting me then. -

no prob