Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > C++ > C++ Standards

Reply
Thread Tools

C++ Standards

 
 
rkldabs@gmail.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-23-2008
Hi,

I would like to know about some of the terminology of the C++
standards.

As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URL http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
correct? I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

Regards,
Dabs.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
puzzlecracker
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-23-2008
On Jul 23, 6:05*am, Pete Becker <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, (E-Mail Removed) said:
>
>
>
> > As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
> > by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
> > indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
> > correct?

>
> Yes.
>
> > *I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

>
> They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
> track of what's what.
>
> --
> * Pete
> Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
> Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
> (www.petebecker.com/tr1book)


Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
consideration.

Thanks
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ian Collins
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-23-2008
puzzlecracker wrote:
> On Jul 23, 6:05 am, Pete Becker <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, (E-Mail Removed) said:
>>
>>
>>
>>> As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
>>> by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
>>> indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
>>> correct?

>> Yes.
>>
>>> I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

>> They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
>> track of what's what.
>>

*Please* don't quote signatures.
>
> Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
> of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
> consideration.
>

You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
published document. For now, check the draft.

--
Ian Collins.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Johannes Bauer
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-23-2008
Ian Collins schrieb:

> You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
> published document. For now, check the draft.


Wasn't that "Tardis"? And wouldn't a Delorean do as well?

Regards,
Johannes

--
"Wer etwas kritisiert muss es noch lange nicht selber besser können. Es
reicht zu wissen, daß andere es besser können und andere es auch
besser machen um einen Vergleich zu bringen." - Wolfgang Gerber
in de.sci.electronics <47fa8447$0$11545$(E-Mail Removed)>
 
Reply With Quote
 
puzzlecracker
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-23-2008
On Jul 23, 3:02*pm, Pete Becker <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> On 2008-07-23 14:02:28 -0400, puzzlecracker <(E-Mail Removed)> said:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 6:05*am, Pete Becker <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, (E-Mail Removed) said:

>
> >>> As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
> >>> by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22

> > /wg21/
> >>> indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
> >>> correct?

>
> >> Yes.

>
> >>> *I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

>
> >> They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
> >> track of what's what.

>
> >> --
> >> * Pete
> >> Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
> >> Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
> >> (www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

>
> > Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
> > of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
> > consideration.

>
> The latest draft standard is N2691.
>
> --
> * Pete
> Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
> Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
> (www.petebecker.com/tr1book)


link please
 
Reply With Quote
 
Ian Collins
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-24-2008
Johannes Bauer wrote:
> Ian Collins schrieb:
>
>> You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
>> published document. For now, check the draft.

>
> Wasn't that "Tardis"? And wouldn't a Delorean do as well?
>



--
Ian Collins.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FRS standards / Atchitecture Design of a System SMG ASP .Net 0 07-28-2004 05:19 AM
Evolving Web App Standards and ASP.NET =?Utf-8?B?bWtsYXBw?= ASP .Net 4 07-20-2004 07:52 AM
asp.net and Web Accessibility Standards Paul G ASP .Net 1 02-26-2004 10:26 PM
coding standards Jim Culver ASP .Net 4 09-18-2003 02:59 AM
coding standards shbgupta ASP .Net 2 06-27-2003 08:48 AM



Advertisments