«

Hi,

I would like to know about some of the terminology of the C++
standards.

As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URL http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
correct? I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.

Regards,
Dabs.

On Jul 23, 6:05*am, Pete Becker <p...@versatilecoding.com> wrote:
> On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, rkld...@gmail.com said:
>
>
>
> > As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
> > by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
> > indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
> > correct?
>
> Yes.
>
> > *I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.
>
> They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
> track of what's what.
>
> --
> * Pete
> Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
> Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
> (www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
consideration.

Thanks

puzzlecracker wrote:
> On Jul 23, 6:05 am, Pete Becker <p...@versatilecoding.com> wrote:
>> On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, rkld...@gmail.com said:
>>
>>
>>
>>> As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
>>> by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/
>>> indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
>>> correct?
>> Yes.
>>
>>> I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.
>> They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
>> track of what's what.
>>
*Please* don't quote signatures.
>
> Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
> of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
> consideration.
>
You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
published document. For now, check the draft.

--
Ian Collins.

Ian Collins schrieb:

> You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
> published document. For now, check the draft.

Wasn't that "Tardis"? And wouldn't a Delorean do as well?

Regards,
Johannes

--
"Wer etwas kritisiert muss es noch lange nicht selber besser können. Es
reicht zu wissen, daß andere es besser können und andere es auch
besser machen um einen Vergleich zu bringen." - Wolfgang Gerber
in de.sci.electronics <47fa8447$0$11545$>

On Jul 23, 3:02*pm, Pete Becker <p...@versatilecoding.com> wrote:
> On 2008-07-23 14:02:28 -0400, puzzlecracker <ironsel2...@gmail.com> said:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 6:05*am, Pete Becker <p...@versatilecoding.com> wrote:
> >> On 2008-07-23 02:47:32 -0400, rkld...@gmail.com said:
>
> >>> As per my understanding the current official C++ standard is approved
> >>> by ISO and is called ISO14882. The URLhttp://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22
> > /wg21/
> >>> indicates that the latest draft standard is N2691. Is my understanding
> >>> correct?
>
> >> Yes.
>
> >>> *I also want to know what is the concept behind N* documents.
>
> >> They're numbered documents. No deep concept, just a way of keeping
> >> track of what's what.
>
> >> --
> >> * Pete
> >> Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
> >> Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
> >> (www.petebecker.com/tr1book)
>
> > Where can I find what's 100% accepted in the new standard? I am sort
> > of confused as to what made it ,what didn't or/and under
> > consideration.
>
> The latest draft standard is N2691.
>
> --
> * Pete
> Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
> Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
> (www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

link please

Johannes Bauer wrote:
> Ian Collins schrieb:
>
>> You'd have to borrow a Trardis and hop into the future to read the
>> published document. For now, check the draft.
>
> Wasn't that "Tardis"? And wouldn't a Delorean do as well?
>


--
Ian Collins.