«

I'd like to determine if a method has been overridden as was asked
here:

http://www.velocityreviews.com/forum...rfunction.html

The answer was can't do it, but I thought I'd ask here, my test code
is:

#include <iostream>

class B {
public:
B() {}
~B() {}
virtual void m() {}
};

class A : public B {
public:
A() {}
~A() {}
virtual void m() {}
};


void test(const B &r) {
if (&r.m == &B::m) {
// do something not overridden
std::cout << "not overridden" << std::endl;
} else {
// do something else was overridden
std::cout << "overridden" << std::endl;
}
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
A a;
B b;

test(b);
test(a);
return 0;
}




The compiler (gcc 4.0.3) complains:

tor.cc: In function 'void test(const B&)':
tor.cc:22: error: ISO C++ forbids taking the address of a bound member
function to form a pointer to member function. Say '&B::m'

Any suggestions on how this can be done?

Thanks

-- Wink Saville

On 2008-07-11 22:00, wink wrote:
> I'd like to determine if a method has been overridden as was asked
> here:
>
> http://www.velocityreviews.com/forum...rfunction.html
>
> The answer was can't do it, but I thought I'd ask here, my test code
> is:
>
> #include <iostream>
>
> class B {
> public:
> B() {}
> ~B() {}
> virtual void m() {}
> };
>
> class A : public B {
> public:
> A() {}
> ~A() {}
> virtual void m() {}
> };
>
>
> void test(const B &r) {
> if (&r.m == &B::m) {
> // do something not overridden
> std::cout << "not overridden" << std::endl;
> } else {
> // do something else was overridden
> std::cout << "overridden" << std::endl;
> }
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
> A a;
> B b;
>
> test(b);
> test(a);
> return 0;
> }
>
>
>
>
> The compiler (gcc 4.0.3) complains:
>
> tor.cc: In function 'void test(const B&)':
> tor.cc:22: error: ISO C++ forbids taking the address of a bound member
> function to form a pointer to member function. Say '&B::m'
>
> Any suggestions on how this can be done?

Even if your code worked you would probably only get an index into the
objects vtable, which will be the same for both the base class and the
derived class.

--
Erik Wikström

On Jul 11, 1:08*pm, Victor Bazarov <v.Abaza...@comAcast.net> wrote:
> wink wrote:
> > I'd like to determine if a method has been overridden as was asked
> > here:
>
> >http://www.velocityreviews.com/forum...ng-whether-a-d...
>
> > The answer was can't do it, but I thought I'd ask here [...]
>
> So, the replies of two experts who frequent this newsgroup are not
> enough for you, are they?

Sorry didn't realize it was an authoritative response.

>
> Let me ask you this: why do you think you need to know whether the
> function has or hasn't been overridden?

I was writing test code and didn't want to do the test if
the method wasn't overridden.

>
> > Any suggestions on how this can be done?
>
> No, not really. *The language does not have the mechanism probably
> because it is not necessary in a normal course of C++ programming.

So I guess if it becomes really important I'll have the author
of the derived calls communicate the information to the test code
directly.

Thanks,

-- Wink

On Jul 11, 1:00*pm, wink <w...@saville.com> wrote:
> I'd like to determine if a method has been overridden as was asked
> here:
>
> http://www.velocityreviews.com/forum...ng-whether-a-d...
>
> The answer was can't do it, but I thought I'd ask here, my test code
> is:
>
>...
>
> The compiler (gcc 4.0.3) complains:
>
> tor.cc: In function 'void test(const B&)':
> tor.cc:22: error: ISO C++ forbids taking the address of a bound member
> function to form a pointer to member function. *Say '&B::m'
>
> Any suggestions on how this can be done?

The g++ compiler does allow taking the address of a bound member
function as a C++ language extension. Essentially, the C++ program
must be compiled with a "-Wno-pmf-conversions" flag. There is also
some unusual syntax required to obtain the address of the bound member
pointer. For details, see this comp.lang.c++.moderated post of mine:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/6s3skt

Greg

On Jul 14, 5:52*am, Greg Herlihy <gre...@mac.com> wrote:
> On Jul 11, 1:00*pm, wink <w...@saville.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'd like to determine if a method has been overridden as was asked
> > here:
>
> >http://www.velocityreviews.com/forum...ng-whether-a-d...
>
> > The answer was can't do it, but I thought I'd ask here, my test code
> > is:
>
> >...
>
> > The compiler (gcc 4.0.3) complains:
>
> > tor.cc: In function 'void test(const B&)':
> > tor.cc:22: error: ISO C++ forbids taking the address of a bound member
> > function to form a pointer to member function. *Say '&B::m'
>
> > Any suggestions on how this can be done?
>
> The g++ compiler does allow taking the address of a bound member
> function as a C++ language extension. Essentially, the C++ program
> must be compiled with a "-Wno-pmf-conversions" flag. There is also
> some unusual syntax required to obtain the address of the bound member
> pointer. For details, see this comp.lang.c++.moderated post of mine:
>
> * * *http://preview.tinyurl.com/6s3skt
>
> Greg

It worked, I wonder what other compilers
support this or similar extension?

Thanks,

-- Wink