«

John McWilliams <> wrote:
> Chris Malcolm wrote:
>> David Harmon <> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:30:11 GMT in rec.photo.digital, J?rgen Exner
>>> <> wrote,
>>>> nospam <> wrote:
>>>>> In article <>, J?rgen Exner
>>>>> <> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve <> wrote:
>>>>>>> Vibrations from the shutter or mirror? I'm not sure there's much you
>>>>>>> can do about the shutter.
>>>>>> Oh yes, you can. Replace those pesky, obsolete, mechanical shutters with
>>>>>> modern, fancy, electronic shutters. This has been done in P&S for a long
>>>>>> time and it is surprising that dSLR are so far behind in development.
>>>>> which affects shutter lag time and sensor blooming. there's always
>>>>> tradeoffs...
>>>> OMG, how large to I have to write those <SARCASM> tags?
>>
>>> There is no sarcasm on Usenet. It was tried; it didn't work.
>>
>> It didn't work in the US

> Cute, Chris. You've shown yourself to be a xenophobe, smilies
> notwithstanding.

That's a peculiarly parochial definition of xenophobe you're using

--
Chris Malcolm DoD #205
IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
[http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

John McWilliams <> wrote:
> Chris Malcolm wrote:
>> John McWilliams <> wrote:
>>> Chris Malcolm wrote:
>>>> David Harmon <> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:30:11 GMT in rec.photo.digital, J?rgen Exner
>>>>> <> wrote,
>>>>>> nospam <> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <>, J?rgen Exner
>>>>>>> <> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Steve <> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Vibrations from the shutter or mirror? I'm not sure there's much you
>>>>>>>>> can do about the shutter.
>>>>>>>> Oh yes, you can. Replace those pesky, obsolete, mechanical shutters with
>>>>>>>> modern, fancy, electronic shutters. This has been done in P&S for a long
>>>>>>>> time and it is surprising that dSLR are so far behind in development.
>>>>>>> which affects shutter lag time and sensor blooming. there's always
>>>>>>> tradeoffs...
>>>>>> OMG, how large to I have to write those <SARCASM> tags?
>>>>> There is no sarcasm on Usenet. It was tried; it didn't work.
>>>> It didn't work in the US
>>
>>> Cute, Chris. You've shown yourself to be a xenophobe, smilies
>>> notwithstanding.
>>
>> That's a peculiarly parochial definition of xenophobe you're using

> Parochial is as parochial does, n'est-ce pas?

And a similarly parochial definition of parochial.

--
Chris Malcolm DoD #205
IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
[http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]