«

Is it legal to have something like:
<xs:complexType name="transaction">
<xs:choice minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:sequence minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:element name="account_login"
type="login_data" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
<xs:element name="create_id"
type="tbl_iv" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
<xs:element name="org_create"
type="org" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>

Notice how there is a sequence inside a choice and nothing else.

Also, what do the minOccurs/maxOccurs modifiers do on the choice and
sequence grouping?

Ryan wrote:
> Is it legal to have something like:
> <xs:complexType name="transaction">
> <xs:choice minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> <xs:sequence minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> <xs:element name="account_login"
> type="login_data" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> <xs:element name="create_id"
> type="tbl_iv" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> <xs:element name="org_create"
> type="org" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:choice>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> Notice how there is a sequence inside a choice and nothing else.

I think that is allowed but you can check yourself with a schema
validator like http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv
It is a different question whether it makes much sense and can not be
simplified, it seems to me that the above can be simplified to simply
put the sequence directly into the complexType.

> Also, what do the minOccurs/maxOccurs modifiers do on the choice and
> sequence grouping?

Saying that the whole choice or sequence can occur as often as the
maxOccurs specifies so unbounded or exactly once as the minOccurs="1"
specifies.


--

Martin Honnen
http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/

On Jun 19, 11:28 am, Martin Honnen <mahotr...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Ryan wrote:
> > Is it legal to have something like:
> > <xs:complexType name="transaction">
> > <xs:choice minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> > <xs:sequence minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> > <xs:element name="account_login"
> > type="login_data" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> > <xs:element name="create_id"
> > type="tbl_iv" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> > <xs:element name="org_create"
> > type="org" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:choice>
> > </xs:complexType>
>
> > Notice how there is a sequence inside a choice and nothing else.
>
> I think that is allowed but you can check yourself with a schema
> validator likehttp://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv
> It is a different question whether it makes much sense and can not be
> simplified, it seems to me that the above can be simplified to simply
> put the sequence directly into the complexType.
>
> > Also, what do the minOccurs/maxOccurs modifiers do on the choice and
> > sequence grouping?
>
> Saying that the whole choice or sequence can occur as often as the
> maxOccurs specifies so unbounded or exactly once as the minOccurs="1"
> specifies.
>
> --
>
> Martin Honnen
> http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/

So, according to the original xsd, would this be valid:

<transaction>
<account_login>data</account_login>
<org_create>data</org_create>
<org_create>data</org_create>
<create_id>data</create_id>
<org_create>data</org_create>
</transaction>

Stipulating that data is valid data inside the pairs.

Ryan wrote:

> So, according to the original xsd, would this be valid:
>
> <transaction>

The original xsd you posted only defined a complexType named
transaction, not an element of that name.
If you define

<xs:schema xmlnss="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xs:element name="transaction" type="transaction"/>
<xs:complexType name="transaction">
<xs:choice minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:sequence minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:element name="account_login"
type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
<xs:element name="create_id"
type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
<xs:element name="org_create"
type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>

then I think your sample is valid.


--

Martin Honnen
http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/

From your comments it sounds to me that if you have
<xs:choice minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"><xs:sequence
minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<!-- elements -->
</xs:sequence></xs:choice>

That the outer choice is ignored. Is this accurate?

-Ryan

On Jun 20, 4:57 am, Martin Honnen <mahotr...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Ryan wrote:
> > So, according to the original xsd, would this be valid:
>
> > <transaction>
>
> The original xsd you posted only defined a complexType named
> transaction, not an element of that name.
> If you define
>
> <xs:schema xmlnss="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> <xs:element name="transaction" type="transaction"/>
> <xs:complexType name="transaction">
> <xs:choice minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> <xs:sequence minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> <xs:element name="account_login"
> type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> <xs:element name="create_id"
> type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> <xs:element name="org_create"
> type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:choice>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:schema>
>
> then I think your sample is valid.
>
> --
>
> Martin Honnen
> http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/

Ryan wrote:
> From your comments it sounds to me that if you have
> <xs:choice minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"><xs:sequence
> minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> <!-- elements -->
> </xs:sequence></xs:choice>
>
> That the outer choice is ignored. Is this accurate?

I don't think it is ignored by the schema parser or the validator. But
it looks to me as if you could simplify the structure if you want to.


--

Martin Honnen
http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/