Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > HTML > Re: I had my site 'professionaly' reviewed.

Thread Tools

Re: I had my site 'professionaly' reviewed.

John Hosking
Posts: n/a
Mike Barnard wrote:
> Hi all.
> A lot of you helped me design my site ( a few
> months ago. You might be interested in what I was told today.
> British Telecom have a site that gives a free 15 minute review of your
> site.
> <>

Why is it free, I wonder? Is this just a true, benificent act of purity?
Or are they hoping to sell you something (like site development services)?

> Well, it's free so I had it done. I was told "Your site looks as if
> you did it yourself. It looks amateurish." On asking why he said "It's
> the layout. It fills my entire screen. It would look much better if it
> was a fixed width in the centre."

It'd look much better to him, because that's what he's used to seeing,
because that's what so many professional designers do. Doesn't make it
right, or good. He'd probably like lots of Verdana and Flash and faded

Did he say *which* fixed width you're supposed to use? If he gave you a
width in pixels, what does he say when you add (or subtract) 1 (or 10 or
100) and ask him about vistors with that size viewport?

> Sigh. Is he a plonker?

Yes. I don't actually know what a plonker is, but he sounds like one.

> His JOB is reviewing websites.

Yeah, well, G.W.Bush's job is to protect the Constitution and...

> He didn't have much else to say other than "Use meta data" and "Fill
> the title with stuff for google to pick up on". Anyone else in the UK
> used this service?

I'd agree with the otherwise clueless "use meta data," to the extent
that I recommend you add a Description, which some/many search engines
use when returning results. Currently, e.g., Yahoo returns your first
content, up to the first items in your nav menu.

<meta NAME="description" CONTENT="Michael Barnard, Independent Fire Risk
Assessor: Risk assessment for your UK firm>

Do feel free to use different descriptions for different pages. They're
different pages, aren't they?

And like the guy said, do also feel free to use different titles for
different pages.

<title>Michael Barnard: Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005</title>

Long titles are only useful for Google-stuffing, so I'd drop the Mr. (no
offense) and get to the goodies.

I'm not in the UK, so I haven't used this.

As regards the review "service": You get what you pay for.

Of course, Usenet is a free service...
Reply With Quote
Posts: n/a
In article <48568855$(E-Mail Removed)>,
John Hosking <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> Mike Barnard wrote:

> > Sigh. Is he a plonker?

> Yes. I don't actually know what a plonker is, but he sounds like one.

A plonker is a sort of general grump who goes through life saying just
about anything negative that comes into his mind without thinking much
of all the relevant circumstances.

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: I had my site 'professionaly' reviewed. Paul HTML 1 06-21-2008 11:50 PM
Re: I had my site 'professionaly' reviewed. Marty Fremen HTML 2 06-17-2008 10:44 AM
Re: I had my site 'professionaly' reviewed. richard HTML 1 06-17-2008 10:42 AM
Have you ever had your computer crashed at 3am and wished that you had someone to call? lifestylelink Computer Support 10 08-12-2006 03:05 PM
Nasty javascript from phishing site had IE stuffed. frederick NZ Computing 1 08-17-2004 07:41 AM