«

"Evans" <> wrote in message
news:c8d76788-0fc3-465c-bfe4-...
> You still haven't changed both the name and the picture you idiot??
>
> My advice to you is to get a sledge hammer and start breaking into
> people's homes for their computer. That's the only way you can get
> access to peoples computer - trust me.
>
> Good luck!
> Evans

If you were replying to me, you must have missed my attempt at humor. I'll
try to make it funnier next time.

Daniel Pitts <> wrote in
news:48555109$0$13382$:

> Agent Smith wrote:
>> Daniel Pitts <> wrote in
>> news:4854a465$0$13383$:
>>
>>> Agent Smith wrote:
>>>> Daniel Pitts <> wrote in
>>>> news:485416ea$0$13399$:
>>>>
>>>>> Chase Preuninger wrote:
>>>>>> I consider hacking and that kind of stuff to be very useful and
>>>>>> worthwhile.
>>>>> I agree, but I think that the OP isn't the kind of person I would
>>>>> want to know how to hack. I have a feeling it would be for petty
>>>>> purposes.
>>>> You don't honestly think that his attention span is long enough to
>>>> teach himself such an intricate skill. ?
>>> Which is exactly why I don't feel like giving him the tools to
>>> bypass his ADD and achieve the fleeting goal of nothing-productive.
>>
>> On the hacking bbs's, it's traditional to give the clueless newbies a
>> link to a code called "ValuHack," which is basically a "Hello World"
>> code, that prints a different character string, with all sorts of
>> pointless bells and whistles.
>>
>> Personally, I would post a reply saying "Use the <fill-in>
>> statement," knowing full well that an entire code must be crafted
>> around the <fill in> statement, to make proper use of it.
>>
>> You'd be answering his question honestly, while still knowing with
>> absolute certainty that his short attention span would inhibit
>> success in his momentary whim. ?:]
>>
>> Various useful results may grow from this approach. The fool might
>> teach himself something useful, by taking the time to try to craft a
>> working code around <fill in> statement, before predictably losing
>> interest. Somebody more facile may make an interesting point as
>> follow-up, or someone competent might build a keylogger and
>> contribute to the hacking community.
>>
>> This approach, known as "giving the wolf a taste, while keeping him
>> hungry," has long been valued as much more useful than spitting on a
>> nobody. Rather than witholding knowldege completely, The Guru is
>> adept at doling out small portions, directing the motivations of
>> others. He gets others to make interesting things happen for him,
>> while maintaining control over future events.
>
> How vary Zen. I like it...
>
> This is not a hacking BBS though, so that
> tradition hasn't yet been established here.
>
>> Kapish?
>
> What?
>
> Daniel.

Verstehest du? ( sic :b )

Joshua Cranmer ... thank you
but I think everyone is free to post a question but if it doesn't suit
you don't reply it's very easy
but you don't talked about the advise of evans to change my name and
picture... you think that is not disturbing the group ???
It's very LOGIC ...

Lew <> wrote in
news::

> Agent Smith wrote:
>
>> Kapish?
>
> Correct spelling: "Capisce?"

You're not the first to say that, and I must remember to study some sinmple
Hungarian. soon. :b

> Otherwise I thought your answer was very interesting and potentially
> the right way to go.

I was once told that Zen teaches something called "The Middle Way," and
since it seems clear that the possibilities of either completely giving or
completely witholding an answer are the extreme choices, anything in
between must at least be an approximation to The Middle Way, right? ?:]

"Lew" <> wrote in message
news:nr6dnQ-...
> Chronic Philharmonic wrote:
>> If you were replying to me, you must have missed my attempt at humor.
>> I'll try to make it funnier next time.
>
> He wasn't, as he mentioned about six hours prior to your response.

Yes, I see that now. Sorry I hurt your computer.

On Jun 15, 9:46=A0pm, Evans <onyx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You still haven't changed both the name and the picture you idiot??

That looks irreplaceable in a reply to C.P., yet is
heinously referring to the OP.

--
Franklin T.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"MSNBC talk-show host Chris Matthews said war supporters
in the Bush Pentagon were 'in bed' with Israeli hawks
eager to take out Saddam."