In article <Xns9AB3CCE57BFF1neredbojiasnano@85.214.90.236>,
Neredbojias <me@http://www.neredbojias.net/_eml/fliam.php> wrote:
> On 03 Jun 2008, dorayme <> wrote:
>
> > In article <Xns9AB2CA40CEF8Aneredbojiasnano@85.214.90.236>,
> > Neredbojias <me@http://www.neredbojias.net/_eml/fliam.php> wrote:
> >
> >> No argument, and I'm _not_ trying to tell you what to do at all. My
> >> own solution is to simply to use gmail which is excellent in weeding
> >> out spam for normal use, and have formmail on my website which I can
> >> control completely. I cou
> >
> > What is all this traffic you guys are talking? I have not had a
> > private email, a live visitor or a phone call on either my mobile or
> > landline for 17 years.
>
> Huh? We're talking about email in general.
So? If it is such a general discussion about emails, why can't we talk
about no emails? What is it that you have against the non existing?
Do you know that I am on the verge of cracking how to spam you by
positively not sending you an email. It works like this, I get you to
*expect* an email. And then I *don't send it* and this alters your state
of mind.
The trick is to make this altered state make you send money to me. If
you want more details of this scheme or if you would like to invest -
trust me, it WILL be a big success - please send some US dollars.
Remember, *not* sending millions of people spam emails is a huge money
saver for the non sender.
--
dorayme
|