re:
!> Actually from my experience it does recycle on create/rename sub folder event in app_data.
Filesystemwatcher events are supposed to be ignored by the ASP.NET runtime.
App_Data is designed not to respond to this filesystemwatcher behavior.
Since directories are a special type of file, anyway, directory changes under App_Data
aren't supposed to trigger filesystemwatcher behavior...but you're right, they do.
"ASP.NET developers know that if you create a new file , modify any file in the application
root or the /bin folder, or modify web.config, this will trigger an application restart."
As a result of extensive testing, using Web Application Projects,
I've found that these are the file events which trigger application restarts :
1. Adding, modifying, or deleting any source code file in any application folder ( *.cs, *.vb, etc. )
2. Adding, modifying or deleting global.asax or web.config.
3. Adding, modifying or creating any assemblies in the /bin folder
4. Adding, modifying, or deleting localization resources
from the App_GlobalResources or App_LocalResources folders.
5. Adding, modifying, or deleting source code files in the App_Code directory.
6. Adding, modifying, or deleting Profile configuration.
7. Adding, modifying, or deleting Web service references in the App_WebReferences directory.
8 Adding, renaming or deleting any directory.
*** If anybody knows of any other event which triggers an application restart,
if a WAP is used, please post the info so the list can be updated. ***
Regarding "standard" web site projects, I need to do more testing,
but I suspect that application restarts won't occur when a single
source file is modified, unless it's located in App_Code.
That would leave items 2-8 in the above list, eliminating only item 1.
*** If anybody has tested the website project scenario and found
different behavior, please post the info so the list can be updated. ***
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :
http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en espaņol :
http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"George Ter-Saakov" <gt-> wrote in message news:...
> Actually from my experience it does recycle on create/rename sub folder event in app_data. Not sure about file's
> events.
>
> George.
>
> "bruce barker" <> wrote in message
> news:5EB9AD27-CB4E-4D08-A85F-...
>> asp.net runs a file monitor and recycles on any change in any folder under
>> its vdir except app_data. you have a couple options.
>>
>> 1) switch to fat file system that does not support file monitoring
>>
>> 2) place the sub apps under the app_data folder.
>>
>> 3) (most logical) do not have the /content physical file folder under the
>> root app's file folder, but create the vdir under the root.
>>
>>
>> -- bruce (sqlwork.com)
>>
>>
>> "IUnknown" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Ok, we are all aware of the situation where modifying the folder
>>> structure (adding files, folders, deleting files, etc) will result in
>>> ASP.NET triggering a recompilation/restart of the application.
>>>
>>> In a nutshell, I understand how this can be considered desireable by
>>> some, but I am not one of those people.
>>>
>>> My situation is that we have a root site (hosted @ http://www.mydomain.com)
>>> in the root application folder '/'.
>>>
>>> This is an ASP.NET 2.0 application, running in it's own application
>>> pool. It is sporatically updated (receives about 1 production build
>>> per quarter). This site isn't allowed to be down.... ever... 
>>>
>>> Beneath this site, in '/content/someOtherApplication' is running an
>>> older .NET 1.1 application in a seperate application pool, configured
>>> as an application in IIS......that receives almost daily updates.
>>>
>>> So, when a new build to /content/someOtherApplication is pushed, the
>>> root application '/' restarts as well.
>>>
>>> Definitely a bad situation, and something I am looking to avoid.
>>>
>>> Aside from telling me to put things in non-nested virtual directories
>>> (which is absolutely not an option), what can I do?
>>>
>>> In a perfect world, I would like to simply tell ASP.NET to NOT restart
>>> the apps automagically, but I suspect there is some other means to
>>> configure this so that I can retain that 'feature' for appropriate
>>> scenarios.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>