You would have the Bridge picking up the signal and connecting into the RV
Park's system,...then you connect a simple Switch to it. Connect wired
machines to the Switch. Connect the WAP54g directly to the Switch as well
and the wireless machine would use that.
I see no place or reason for there to ever be a "DSL Modem" anywhere.
If you use the WRT54g3g you won't need to use any "hotspot" and can use it
anywhere there is a strong enough cell tower signal. There would be a
WRT54g3g,...and that is it,...nothing else.
There are 3 variations of it depending on if you use Sprint, AT&T or
Verizon. It has built in Switch ports for the Wired machines and a built in
Wireless Access Point for the Wireless machines.
http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satel...=4676233028B15
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
"Bob" <> wrote in message
news:...
> I'm about to depart the hot southwest desert for the mountains in our
> travel trailer. Last year the WIFI service was marginal (mainly low
> signal levels inside the trailer), so this year I've installed an
> outside directional antenna on a rotor. Since both my wife and I want
> to use computers at the same time, I created an in trailer network.
>
> It consists of: from the house Qwest(Actionteck) DSL modem to a
> Linksys WET54g bridge(located in the trailer) (wired) to a Linksys 4
> port hub. From the hub I connect (wired) to my computer. Also,
> (wired) to a Linksys WAP54g access point. Connecting to the WAP54g
> (wireless) is a WMB54g music bridge to the trailer audio system. When
> feeding audio from my computer the system works OK.
>
> When I connected the laptop (wireless) to the WAP54g, I get a good
> signal level connection, however when browsing the WEB, the screens
> are somewhat jumbled or I get a "can't display that page" error.
> Connecting directly (wireless) to the Qwest modem, things are OK.
>
> Am I trying to do something that isn't feaseable?
> Thanks
>
> FYI, the coax feeding the WET54G is about 8 inches - I mounted the
> WET54g just inside the roof and the antenna is just outside the roof.
> Besides, the signal level is shown as 100% on both WIFI sources.
> (Probably not quite the same, but certainly adaquate.)