Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > C++ > comp.lang.c++.moderated and comp.std.c++ dead?

Reply
Thread Tools

comp.lang.c++.moderated and comp.std.c++ dead?

 
 
Jim Langston
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-03-2008
Does anyone know what happned to the moderator of comp.lang.c++.moderated
and/or comp.std.c++ ? Both of them have not had messages for a while, and
I"m suspecting the same moderator moderates both of them.

Last message I see on comp.lang.c++.moderated is 12/6/2007 (Dec. 6th) and
for comp.std.c++ is 1/6/2008 (January 6th).

I'm trying to determine what happened to the moderator(s) of these
newsgroups so we can figure out what to do about them.

--
Jim Langston



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ian Collins
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-03-2008
Jim Langston wrote:
> Does anyone know what happned to the moderator of comp.lang.c++.moderated
> and/or comp.std.c++ ? Both of them have not had messages for a while, and
> I"m suspecting the same moderator moderates both of them.
>
> Last message I see on comp.lang.c++.moderated is 12/6/2007 (Dec. 6th) and
> for comp.std.c++ is 1/6/2008 (January 6th).
>

Alf answered for comp.std.c++ (see thread "C++0x: atomic_load") and the
last posting on comp.lang.c++.moderated was 14 hours ago. I assume the
mods are in bed!

--
Ian Collins.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jim Langston
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-03-2008
Ian Collins wrote:
> Jim Langston wrote:
>> Does anyone know what happned to the moderator of
>> comp.lang.c++.moderated and/or comp.std.c++ ? Both of them have not
>> had messages for a while, and I"m suspecting the same moderator
>> moderates both of them.
>>
>> Last message I see on comp.lang.c++.moderated is 12/6/2007 (Dec.
>> 6th) and for comp.std.c++ is 1/6/2008 (January 6th).
>>

> Alf answered for comp.std.c++ (see thread "C++0x: atomic_load") and
> the last posting on comp.lang.c++.moderated was 14 hours ago. I
> assume the mods are in bed!


You are telling me you are seeing messages in those newsgroups? Strange.
Maybe it's something on my end. So very weird. I haven't seen any messages
in the newsgroups since December and January.

--
Jim Langston



 
Reply With Quote
 
Ian Collins
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-03-2008
Jim Langston wrote:
> Ian Collins wrote:
>> Jim Langston wrote:
>>> Does anyone know what happned to the moderator of
>>> comp.lang.c++.moderated and/or comp.std.c++ ? Both of them have not
>>> had messages for a while, and I"m suspecting the same moderator
>>> moderates both of them.
>>>
>>> Last message I see on comp.lang.c++.moderated is 12/6/2007 (Dec.
>>> 6th) and for comp.std.c++ is 1/6/2008 (January 6th).
>>>

>> Alf answered for comp.std.c++ (see thread "C++0x: atomic_load") and
>> the last posting on comp.lang.c++.moderated was 14 hours ago. I
>> assume the mods are in bed!

>
> You are telling me you are seeing messages in those newsgroups? Strange.
> Maybe it's something on my end. So very weird. I haven't seen any messages
> in the newsgroups since December and January.
>

Check Alf's reply, comp.std.c++ is dead, but comp.lang.c++.moderated is
still going strong.

--
Ian Collins.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jim Langston
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      05-03-2008
"Ian Collins" <ian-> wrote in message
news:...
> Jim Langston wrote:
>> Ian Collins wrote:
>>> Jim Langston wrote:
>>>> Does anyone know what happned to the moderator of
>>>> comp.lang.c++.moderated and/or comp.std.c++ ? Both of them have not
>>>> had messages for a while, and I"m suspecting the same moderator
>>>> moderates both of them.
>>>>
>>>> Last message I see on comp.lang.c++.moderated is 12/6/2007 (Dec.
>>>> 6th) and for comp.std.c++ is 1/6/2008 (January 6th).
>>>>
>>> Alf answered for comp.std.c++ (see thread "C++0x: atomic_load") and
>>> the last posting on comp.lang.c++.moderated was 14 hours ago. I
>>> assume the mods are in bed!

>>
>> You are telling me you are seeing messages in those newsgroups? Strange.
>> Maybe it's something on my end. So very weird. I haven't seen any
>> messages
>> in the newsgroups since December and January.
>>

> Check Alf's reply, comp.std.c++ is dead, but comp.lang.c++.moderated is
> still going strong.


Ahh, okay, I unsubscribed to comp.lang.c++.moderated and resubscribed and
now see the messages I was missing before. So it's just comp.std.c++ that's
not working. Thanks. I have an e-mail off to the moderators of
comp.std.c++ to try to figure out what's going on. I miss it.

--
Jim Langston



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
if and and vs if and,and titi VHDL 4 03-11-2007 05:23 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57