«

Hi,
I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf

Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?

Thanks...

ManicQin wrote:
> Hi,
> I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
> http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf
>
> Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?
>
Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. It is not
"free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.

On Apr 24, 1:56*am, red floyd <no.s...@here.dude> wrote:
> ManicQin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
> >http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf
>
> > Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?
>
> Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. *It is not
> "free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.

Which rises a very (very very) ethical question...

ManicQin wrote:
> On Apr 24, 1:56 am, red floyd <no.s...@here.dude> wrote:
>> ManicQin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
>>> http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf
>>> Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?
>> Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. It is not
>> "free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.
>
> Which rises a very (very very) ethical question...

Is that ethical question "why should an international standard be
commercial in the first place"?

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:26:29 -0700 (PDT), ManicQin
<> wrote:

>Hi,
>I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
>http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf
>
>Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?
>
>Thanks...

I use working drafts from
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...s/papers/2008/

Non-existent section in c++03

14.5.3 Variadic templates [temp.variadic]

1 A template parameter pack is a template parameter that accepts zero
or more template arguments. [ Example:

template<class ... Types> struct Tuple { };

Tuple<> t0; // Types contains no arguments
Tuple<int> t1; // Types contains one argument: int
Tuple<int, float> t2; // Types contains two arguments: int and float
Tuple<0> eror; // error: 0 is not a type

—end example ]

this is bleeding edge c++ for you !!

Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a draft
proposal ?

What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

Kindly reply

Thanks
V.Subramanian

, India wrote:
> Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a draft
> proposal ?
>
> What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
> published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.

On Apr 24, 2:24 am, Juha Nieminen <nos...@thanks.invalid> wrote:
> ManicQin wrote:
> > On Apr 24, 1:56 am, red floyd <no.s...@here.dude> wrote:
> >> ManicQin wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
> >>>http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf
> >>> Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?
> >> Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. It is not
> >> "free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.
>
> > Which rises a very (very very) ethical question...
>
> Is that ethical question "why should an international standard be
> commercial in the first place"?

I think that they should be rewarded for they're effort. No?
Besides its a symbol of status, Rappers have Bling Blings and we've
got STD

On Apr 24, 2:07 am, red floyd <no.s...@here.dude> wrote:
> subramanian10...@yahoo.com, India wrote:
> > Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a draft
> > proposal ?
>
> > What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
> > published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)
>
> 2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
> corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.


My question is: is ISO 2003 C++ standard a draft proposal or the final
version. I am using g++ 3.4.3 version which supports only C++98. Are
there compilers which support ISO 2003 C++ standard if it is final
standard(that is, it is not a draft proposal) ?

Kindly clarify.

Thanks
V.Subramanian

On Apr 24, 10:01 am, "Victor Bazarov" <v.Abaza...@comAcast.net> wrote:
> subramanian10...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > On Apr 24, 2:07 am, red floyd <no.s...@here.dude> wrote:
> >> subramanian10...@yahoo.com, India wrote:
> >>> Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a
> >>> draft proposal ?
>
> >>> What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
> >>> published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)
>
> >> 2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
> >> corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.
>
> > My question is: is ISO 2003 C++ standard a draft proposal or the final
> > version.
>
> Say, what in "2003 is the latest official standard" do you not understand?
> Which word in that statement confuses you? The "latest" or the "official"?
>
> > I am using g++ 3.4.3 version which supports only C++98. Are
> > there compilers which support ISO 2003 C++ standard if it is final
> > standard(that is, it is not a draft proposal) ?
>
> > Kindly clarify.
>
> Kindly reread red floyd's reply.
>
>
>
> > Thanks
> > V.Subramanian
>
> V
> --
> Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
> I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

I get it now. C++98 plus Technical Corrigendum 1 is ISO 2003. Am I
correct.

I am reading TC++PL 3rd edition by Stroustrup which was published
before ISO C++ 2003. Is it sufficient ?. I request you to suggest some
books which are compliant with ISO C++ 2003 which I can read. Also is
there a g++ compiler which is ISO C++ 2003 compliant.

Has Stroustrup written any book on ISO C++ 2003 ?

Also please let me know the url for Technical Corrigendum 1 document
so that I can read it and update myself with the changes later that C+
+98.

Kindly help.

Thanks
V.Subramanian