Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > C++ > Buying the ISO 14882-2003 Standard

Reply
Thread Tools

Buying the ISO 14882-2003 Standard

 
 
ManicQin
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-23-2008
Hi,
I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf

Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?

Thanks...
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
red floyd
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-23-2008
ManicQin wrote:
> Hi,
> I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
> http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf
>
> Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?
>

Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. It is not
"free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
ManicQin
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-23-2008
On Apr 24, 1:56*am, red floyd <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> ManicQin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
> >http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf

>
> > Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?

>
> Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. *It is not
> "free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.


Which rises a very (very very) ethical question...


 
Reply With Quote
 
Juha Nieminen
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-23-2008
ManicQin wrote:
> On Apr 24, 1:56 am, red floyd <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> ManicQin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
>>> http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf
>>> Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?

>> Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. It is not
>> "free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.

>
> Which rises a very (very very) ethical question...


Is that ethical question "why should an international standard be
commercial in the first place"?
 
Reply With Quote
 
hurcan solter
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-24-2008
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:26:29 -0700 (PDT), ManicQin
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Hi,
>I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
>http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf
>
>Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?
>
>Thanks...


I use working drafts from
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...s/papers/2008/

Non-existent section in c++03

14.5.3 Variadic templates [temp.variadic]

1 A template parameter pack is a template parameter that accepts zero
or more template arguments. [ Example:

template<class ... Types> struct Tuple { };

Tuple<> t0; // Types contains no arguments
Tuple<int> t1; // Types contains one argument: int
Tuple<int, float> t2; // Types contains two arguments: int and float
Tuple<0> eror; // error: 0 is not a type

—end example ]

this is bleeding edge c++ for you !!



 
Reply With Quote
 
subramanian100in@yahoo.com, India
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-24-2008
Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a draft
proposal ?

What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

Kindly reply

Thanks
V.Subramanian
 
Reply With Quote
 
red floyd
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-24-2008
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/(E-Mail Removed), India wrote:
> Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a draft
> proposal ?
>
> What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
> published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)


2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.
 
Reply With Quote
 
ManicQin
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-24-2008
On Apr 24, 2:24 am, Juha Nieminen <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> ManicQin wrote:
> > On Apr 24, 1:56 am, red floyd <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> ManicQin wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
> >>>http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf
> >>> Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?
> >> Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. It is not
> >> "free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.

>
> > Which rises a very (very very) ethical question...

>
> Is that ethical question "why should an international standard be
> commercial in the first place"?


I think that they should be rewarded for they're effort. No?
Besides its a symbol of status, Rappers have Bling Blings and we've
got STD
 
Reply With Quote
 
subramanian100in@yahoo.com, India
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-24-2008
On Apr 24, 2:07 am, red floyd <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> (E-Mail Removed), India wrote:
> > Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a draft
> > proposal ?

>
> > What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
> > published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

>
> 2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
> corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.



My question is: is ISO 2003 C++ standard a draft proposal or the final
version. I am using g++ 3.4.3 version which supports only C++98. Are
there compilers which support ISO 2003 C++ standard if it is final
standard(that is, it is not a draft proposal) ?

Kindly clarify.

Thanks
V.Subramanian

 
Reply With Quote
 
subramanian100in@yahoo.com, India
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-24-2008
On Apr 24, 10:01 am, "Victor Bazarov" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> > On Apr 24, 2:07 am, red floyd <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> (E-Mail Removed), India wrote:
> >>> Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a
> >>> draft proposal ?

>
> >>> What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
> >>> published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

>
> >> 2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
> >> corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.

>
> > My question is: is ISO 2003 C++ standard a draft proposal or the final
> > version.

>
> Say, what in "2003 is the latest official standard" do you not understand?
> Which word in that statement confuses you? The "latest" or the "official"?
>
> > I am using g++ 3.4.3 version which supports only C++98. Are
> > there compilers which support ISO 2003 C++ standard if it is final
> > standard(that is, it is not a draft proposal) ?

>
> > Kindly clarify.

>
> Kindly reread red floyd's reply.
>
>
>
> > Thanks
> > V.Subramanian

>
> V
> --
> Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
> I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask


I get it now. C++98 plus Technical Corrigendum 1 is ISO 2003. Am I
correct.

I am reading TC++PL 3rd edition by Stroustrup which was published
before ISO C++ 2003. Is it sufficient ?. I request you to suggest some
books which are compliant with ISO C++ 2003 which I can read. Also is
there a g++ compiler which is ISO C++ 2003 compliant.

Has Stroustrup written any book on ISO C++ 2003 ?

Also please let me know the url for Technical Corrigendum 1 document
so that I can read it and update myself with the changes later that C+
+98.

Kindly help.

Thanks
V.Subramanian
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buying ISO/IEC 9899:1995 Ioannis Vranos C Programming 4 11-14-2008 08:25 AM
Buying ISO/IEC 9899:1995 Ioannis Vranos C++ 0 11-12-2008 09:00 AM



Advertisments