![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
i am aware that A BGP speaker can influence the best path selection by
a peer by varying the length of the autonomous system path. If i have a statement like route-map ISP-IN permit 10 set as-path prepend 56324 56324 56324 56324 56324 and neighbor 54.134.156.9 route-map ISP-IN in am i actually making the neighbor 54.134.156.9 using route-map isp-in more or less attractive, in recieving inbound traffic to my router. Thanks mmark751969 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
mmark751969 wrote:
> i am aware that A BGP speaker can influence the best path selection by > a peer by varying the length of the autonomous system path. If i have > a statement like > route-map ISP-IN permit 10 > set as-path prepend 56324 56324 56324 56324 56324 > > and > > neighbor 54.134.156.9 route-map ISP-IN in > > am i actually making the neighbor 54.134.156.9 using route-map isp-in > more or less attractive, in recieving inbound traffic to my router. Wrong direction. Should be "route-map <map name> out" Regards, Andrey. Andrey Tarasov |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
In article <ft1oea$28sh$>,
Andrey Tarasov <> wrote: > mmark751969 wrote: > > i am aware that A BGP speaker can influence the best path selection by > > a peer by varying the length of the autonomous system path. If i have > > a statement like > > route-map ISP-IN permit 10 > > set as-path prepend 56324 56324 56324 56324 56324 > > > > and > > > > neighbor 54.134.156.9 route-map ISP-IN in > > > > am i actually making the neighbor 54.134.156.9 using route-map isp-in > > more or less attractive, in recieving inbound traffic to my router. > > Wrong direction. Should be "route-map <map name> out" And the answer to the question is that you're making it less attractive. Shorter AS paths are preferred. -- Barry Margolin, Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** Barry Margolin |
|