Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > C Programming > For Jeff Bailey: The distribution of the articles/content in clc

Thread Tools

For Jeff Bailey: The distribution of the articles/content in clc

Kenny McCormack
Posts: n/a
Your perception of this ng is accurate. To clarify further, I generally
say that the content is:

65%: The endless topicality wars, with the featured attraction
being the frequent Heathfield/Navia battles. This is obviously
the substance of the group, and what keeps people coming back
for more.

30%: Newbie questions, technically not off-topic, but often
bordering on trolling - given that they are often of the:
What does "i = i++ + ++i" do?
variety. Note that even though these are not technically OT,
they are all covered in the available body of text which newbies
are expected to have read and digested before posting - i.e.,
the FAQs and the standards documents. They are, by the
standards of most normal newsgroups, in the category of "bad
questions" - questions that should not be asked, since they've
all been asked many times before, and the answers have all been
written down.

5%: The remaining bits are the "language lawyering" stuff - of
great interest to those who care about such things, but utterly
boring to normal people like us.

So, there you have it. HTH.

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More posts in clc than in clc++ ? Tony C Programming 6 02-10-2009 01:16 PM
Multi-posting clc++ and clc++m (was: Multiply inherit from classes with conflicting function names) Alf P. Steinbach C++ 1 05-26-2006 03:58 AM