«

Hello!

I have tried to do it by myself but I cannot understand why it doesn`t work.

I have such css:

div.fListBox
{
width:296px;
cursorointer;
padding-bottom:5px;
background-color:transparent;
}

div.fListBox:hover
{
background-color: black;
}

Everything works fine in Firefox, but not in IE.
I don`t know why? Can you help me?

The error is when you move mouse i.e. onto "JAS-FBG: logistyka wysokiej jakosci"
in the "POZOSTALE WIADOMOSCI" box (first right column).

Here is the whole page:
http://michalinaken.w.interia.pl/tm.html

Thank you in advance
Martin from Poland

MZ wrote:

> div.fListBox:hover
> {
> background-color: black;
> }
>
> Everything works fine in Firefox, but not in IE.
> I don`t know why? Can you help me?

I haven't looked at your page but, just skimming through your post, I'm
guessing you're talking about IE6 or older. The old versions of IE don't
support :hover on elements other than <a>. I assume that's the problem
you're seeing.

--
John
Read about the UIP: http://improve-usenet.org/

MZ wrote:

> Here is the whole page:
> http://michalinaken.w.interia.pl/tm.html

I was so distracted by all the blinking, jumping and moving stuff - all
over the page - that I couldn't find the link you were talking about.
There is little that causes visitors to hit the Back button quicker than
a page that sends them into an epileptic fit.

--
-bts
-Friends don't let friends drive Vista

I have used javascript code and onmouseover and onmouseout event to do it.

Thank everyone for reading my post
Marcin


Uzytkownik "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <> napisal w
wiadomosci news:cP9Dj.15070$...
> MZ wrote:
>
>> Here is the whole page:
>> http://michalinaken.w.interia.pl/tm.html
>
> I was so distracted by all the blinking, jumping and moving stuff - all
> over the page - that I couldn't find the link you were talking about.
> There is little that causes visitors to hit the Back button quicker than
> a page that sends them into an epileptic fit.
>
> --
> -bts
> -Friends don't let friends drive Vista

In article
<cP9Dj.15070$>,
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <> wrote:

> MZ wrote:
>
> > Here is the whole page:
> > http://michalinaken.w.interia.pl/tm.html
>
> I was so distracted by all the blinking, jumping and moving stuff - all
> over the page - that I couldn't find the link you were talking about.
> There is little that causes visitors to hit the Back button quicker than
> a page that sends them into an epileptic fit.

The delay in rendering even on my very respectable ADSL 2
broadband connection was enough.

--
dorayme

dorayme wrote:
> In article
> <cP9Dj.15070$>,
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <> wrote:
>
>> MZ wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the whole page:
>>> http://michalinaken.w.interia.pl/tm.html
>> I was so distracted by all the blinking, jumping and moving stuff - all
>> over the page - that I couldn't find the link you were talking about.
>> There is little that causes visitors to hit the Back button quicker than
>> a page that sends them into an epileptic fit.
>
> The delay in rendering even on my very respectable ADSL 2
> broadband connection was enough.
>

Yeah, I gave up after a while on my 6+ Mbps cable connect. Isn't it
kinda sad though? I mean, remember the "old days" when we'd wait
seemingly forever for Web pages to load? Or even start downloading a
file at 300 baud and then just walk away to make dinner? Boy, talk
about impatience! Now I have some inkling of what my bi-polar nephew
goes through trying to stick with a task. Sheesh.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
Deja Roo: What? ANOTHER kangaroo?!!!

Uzytkownik "Ed Mullen" <> napisal w wiadomosci
news:. ..
> dorayme wrote:
>> In article <cP9Dj.15070$>,
>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <> wrote:
>>
>>> MZ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here is the whole page:
>>>> http://michalinaken.w.interia.pl/tm.html
>>> I was so distracted by all the blinking, jumping and moving stuff - all
>>> over the page - that I couldn't find the link you were talking about.
>>> There is little that causes visitors to hit the Back button quicker than
>>> a page that sends them into an epileptic fit.
>>
>> The delay in rendering even on my very respectable ADSL 2 broadband
>> connection was enough.
>>
>
> Yeah, I gave up after a while on my 6+ Mbps cable connect. Isn't it kinda sad
> though? I mean, remember the "old days" when we'd wait seemingly forever for
> Web pages to load? Or even start downloading a file at 300 baud and then just
> walk away to make dinner? Boy, talk about impatience! Now I have some
> inkling of what my bi-polar nephew goes through trying to stick with a task.
> Sheesh.
>

I moved only my html + images files into the indirect portal.
This portal is not the destiny of my original files.

Unforutanately every web portal even a soft one, placed in interia.w.pl web
pages, loads very slowly. It is not the fault of the structure of the html
files built by me.

Marcin

MZ wrote:
>
> Uzytkownik "Ed Mullen" <> napisal w wiadomosci
> news:. ..
>> dorayme wrote:
>>> In article <cP9Dj.15070$>,
>>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> MZ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here is the whole page:
>>>>> http://michalinaken.w.interia.pl/tm.html
>>>> I was so distracted by all the blinking, jumping and moving stuff - all
>>>> over the page - that I couldn't find the link you were talking about.
>>>> There is little that causes visitors to hit the Back button quicker
>>>> than
>>>> a page that sends them into an epileptic fit.
>>>
>>> The delay in rendering even on my very respectable ADSL 2 broadband
>>> connection was enough.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I gave up after a while on my 6+ Mbps cable connect. Isn't it
>> kinda sad though? I mean, remember the "old days" when we'd wait
>> seemingly forever for Web pages to load? Or even start downloading a
>> file at 300 baud and then just walk away to make dinner? Boy, talk
>> about impatience! Now I have some inkling of what my bi-polar nephew
>> goes through trying to stick with a task. Sheesh.
>>
>
> I moved only my html + images files into the indirect portal.
> This portal is not the destiny of my original files.
>
> Unforutanately every web portal even a soft one, placed in interia.w.pl web
> pages, loads very slowly. It is not the fault of the structure of the html
> files built by me.
>
> Marcin

I'm not sure about your usage of the term "web portal" and what it
means. If you mean "web host" I have to disagree with you. The web
host I use I settled on because they offer very fast access/load times.
Even accessing my domain from around the world is quite fast. For me,
in the U.S. (and I'm assuming, perhaps not correctly, that my shared
server/host is U.S. based) using Comcast 6 Mbps cable Internet, loads in
less than a second. Users from around the world have reported "long"
load times of the link in my sig of less than 4 seconds.

I use 1 and 1 dot com's "Home" package which costs 5 dollars a month
including registration of 2 domains and very generous facilities.

http://order.1and1.com/

For a hobby, I find 5 dollars/month very reasonable, especially for the
capabilities that are included.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
There's nothing more annoying than Stravinsky or the Sex Pistols being
drowned out by "You've got mail!"