Velocity Reviews > Optimize power function for fixed point numbers

# Optimize power function for fixed point numbers

suppamax
Guest
Posts: n/a

 03-12-2008
Hi everybody!

I'm writing a C program for a PIC18F microcontroller.

I need to calculate a power function, in which both base and exponent
are fixed point numbers (ex: 3.15^1.13).

Using pow() function is too expensive...

Is there another way to do that?

Thanks,

Max

Keith Thompson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 03-12-2008
suppamax <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:
> I'm writing a C program for a PIC18F microcontroller.
>
> I need to calculate a power function, in which both base and exponent
> are fixed point numbers (ex: 3.15^1.13).
>
> Using pow() function is too expensive...
>
> Is there another way to do that?

How are these fixed point numbers represented? Does your compiler
have special support for them? Standard C's only arithmetic types are
integer and floating-point.

If the exponent were always an integer, you could do it with repeated
multiplication; you could save a few multiplications with judicious
use of squaring. But with a non-integral exponent, you're going to
have to do something very similar to what the pow() function does.

I don't think you've given us enough information to help you. We need
a better idea of how the operands are represented, what values they
can have, how precise you need the result to be, and so forth.

It's possible that comp.programming might be a better place to ask;
the solution you're looking for is likely to be an algorithm rather
that something specific to C.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) <(E-Mail Removed)>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

user923005
Guest
Posts: n/a

 03-12-2008
On Mar 12, 9:16*am, suppamax <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I'm writing a C program for a PIC18F microcontroller.
>
> I need to calculate a power function, in which both base and exponent
> are fixed point numbers (ex: 3.15^1.13).
>
> Using pow() function is too expensive...
>
> Is there another way to do that?

Maybe this can help:
http://www.daimi.au.dk/~ivan/FastExpproject.pdf

You might look at the float implementation on the Cephes site:
http://www.moshier.net/#Cephes

user923005
Guest
Posts: n/a

 03-12-2008
On Mar 12, 9:16*am, suppamax <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I'm writing a C program for a PIC18F microcontroller.
>
> I need to calculate a power function, in which both base and exponent
> are fixed point numbers (ex: 3.15^1.13).
>
> Using pow() function is too expensive...
>
> Is there another way to do that?

Can you tell us why you need the power function?
There may be a work-around (e.g. using Horner's rule to evaluate

suppamax
Guest
Posts: n/a

 03-13-2008
> How are these fixed point numbers represented? Does your compiler
> have special support for them? Standard C's only arithmetic types are
> integer and floating-point.
>
> If the exponent were always an integer, you could do it with repeated
> multiplication; you could save a few multiplications with judicious
> use of squaring. But with a non-integral exponent, you're going to
> have to do something very similar to what the pow() function does.
>
> I don't think you've given us enough information to help you. We need
> a better idea of how the operands are represented, what values they
> can have, how precise you need the result to be, and so forth.
>
> It's possible that comp.programming might be a better place to ask;
> the solution you're looking for is likely to be an algorithm rather
> that something specific to C.
>
> --
> Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) <(E-Mail Removed)>
> Nokia
> "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
> -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Numbers always have 2 digits, and are represented as integers.
For example, if the correct value is 3.15, it will be represented as
315.

Max

suppamax
Guest
Posts: n/a

 03-13-2008
> Can you tell us why you need the power function?
> There may be a work-around (e.g. using Horner's rule to evaluate

The function I need to realize is something like

exp = 1.15;
result = 0;
while (...) {
[evaluate base: it will be, for example, 4.77]
result += pow(base, exp);
}

Max

suppamax
Guest
Posts: n/a

 03-13-2008

> That's a little confusing. If numbers always have 2 digits, 315 is not a
> number! Did you mean 3 digits?
>
> --
> Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
> Email: -http://www. +rjh@
> "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

Sorry...

2 decimal digits.

so 3.15 -> 315

Max

Richard Heathfield
Guest
Posts: n/a

 03-13-2008
suppamax said:

<snip>

> Numbers always have 2 digits, and are represented as integers.
> For example, if the correct value is 3.15, it will be represented as
> 315.

That's a little confusing. If numbers always have 2 digits, 315 is not a
number! Did you mean 3 digits?

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

user923005
Guest
Posts: n/a

 03-13-2008
On Mar 13, 1:24*am, suppamax <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > That's a little confusing. If numbers always have 2 digits, 315 is not a
> > number! Did you mean 3 digits?

>
> > --
> > Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
> > Email: -http://www. +rjh@
> > "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

>
> Sorry...
>
> 2 decimal digits.
>
> so 3.15 -> 315

What is the largest possible value in your system?
What is the smallest possible value in your system?
How much memory space do you have available?

Paul Hsieh
Guest
Posts: n/a

 03-13-2008
On Mar 12, 9:16 am, suppamax <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I'm writing a C program for a PIC18F microcontroller.
>
> I need to calculate a power function, in which both base and exponent
> are fixed point numbers (ex: 3.15^1.13).
>
> Using pow() function is too expensive...
>
> Is there another way to do that?

It doesn't seem obvious to me. I guess you would want a break down
like:

two_pow_fromIM ( y * two_log_toIM ( x ) );

The idea would be that two_log_toIM and two_pow_fromIM could be
implemented as a scaling (normalize to the range 1 <= x < 2) then
either a post or pre-shift along with a table look up if the
resolution was small enough (and possibly perform interpolations). To
_fromIM and _toIM reflect the fact you might like to convert it to a
temporarily higher resolution intermediate value, or range corrected
for the particular input values.

I am not aware of any really good approximations to log() or 2exp()
except for taylor series or rational function approximations, which
will end up doing no better than using pow() directly. This table
based stuff would obviously compromise accuracy/resolution.

--
Paul Hsieh
http://www.pobox.com/~qed/
http://bstring.sf.net/

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Saraswati lakki ASP .Net 0 01-06-2012 06:39 AM blackpadme VHDL 4 09-07-2008 03:03 PM blackpadme VHDL 0 09-05-2008 04:06 PM KJ VHDL 0 09-05-2008 03:26 PM Motaz Saad Java 7 11-05-2005 05:33 PM