> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:33:58 -0600, Default User wrote
> > Richard Heathfield wrote:
> >> santosh said:
> >>> This tends to waste vertical space.
> >> That's the disadvantage (for those who consider it so, of whom I am
> >> not one).
> > Yeah, I was unaware that vertical space was in short supply.
> Somewhere, in a dark whole, is someone still left on an 80x25 terminal.
Less. I've programmed on a handheld (a Psion Revo, to be precise),
though not in C.
Anyway, real debugging should be done on paper, not on the screen.
Richard Tobin wrote:
> In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
> Default User <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>> Somewhere, in a dark whole, is someone still left on an 80x25
>> I still use them when I telnet in places. That just seems the "right"
>> size for that.
> It was too small 30 years ago and it's too small now.
Pshaw. My screen is currently covered in 80x25 terminal windows. Nothing
wrong with 'em, perfect for doing 6 things at once.