«

On 3 Mar 2008 at 14:08, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> In article <fqgvkj$tbf$>,
> Richard <devr_@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Oh, puhleaze.
>>
>>Try this:
>>
>>http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war.../ideologue.htm
>
> Could be - but I'm not so sure he's all that motivated by any ideology.
>
> My pick would be (particularly w.r.t. his feud with Jacob): Duelist.

Clc is heavy on Android/Big Dog combinations, with some Me-toos to
bolster their egos.

I suppose Sosman would qualify as a Big Cat.

In article <>,
Antoninus Twink <> wrote:
>On 3 Mar 2008 at 14:08, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>> In article <fqgvkj$tbf$>,
>> Richard <devr_@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Oh, puhleaze.
>>>
>>>Try this:
>>>
>>>http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war.../ideologue.htm
>>
>> Could be - but I'm not so sure he's all that motivated by any ideology.
>>
>> My pick would be (particularly w.r.t. his feud with Jacob): Duelist.
>
>Clc is heavy on Android/Big Dog combinations, with some Me-toos to
>bolster their egos.

KT is Android - to a tee.

>I suppose Sosman would qualify as a Big Cat.

Good point.

Kaz Kylheku wrote:

> Should therefore C++ be regarded as a work of code generation? Is that
> what is interesting about C++? Is Stroustrup's contribution to
> computing that he wrote a program that wrote source code that was fed
> to another program? What about the actual semantics of C++?

Awe, come on, Kaz!

You are more fun to read when you try to catch flies with vinegar!

--
Phlip

Antoninus Twink <> writes:

> On 3 Mar 2008 at 14:08, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>> In article <fqgvkj$tbf$>,
>> Richard <devr_@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Oh, puhleaze.
>>>
>>>Try this:
>>>
>>>http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war.../ideologue.htm
>>
>> Could be - but I'm not so sure he's all that motivated by any ideology.
>>
>> My pick would be (particularly w.r.t. his feud with Jacob): Duelist.
>
> Clc is heavy on Android/Big Dog combinations, with some Me-toos to
> bolster their egos.
>
> I suppose Sosman would qualify as a Big Cat.

Guess which clc clique reg is a 100% match for this type:

http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war...rouscranus.htm

On 3 Mar 2008 at 15:53, Richard wrote:
> Antoninus Twink <> writes:
>
>> On 3 Mar 2008 at 14:08, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>> In article <fqgvkj$tbf$>,
>>> Richard <devr_@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>Oh, puhleaze.
>>>>
>>>>Try this:
>>>>
>>>>http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war.../ideologue.htm
>>>
>>> Could be - but I'm not so sure he's all that motivated by any ideology.
>>>
>>> My pick would be (particularly w.r.t. his feud with Jacob): Duelist.
>>
>> Clc is heavy on Android/Big Dog combinations, with some Me-toos to
>> bolster their egos.
>>
>> I suppose Sosman would qualify as a Big Cat.
>
> Guess which clc clique reg is a 100% match for this type:
>
> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war...rouscranus.htm

Ha ha, that's truly uncanny!

I'd expected him to match the description of Netiquette Nazi as well,
but he's more of a boring old grandad complaining away in the corner
than a Miss Whiplash!

Antoninus Twink <> writes:

> On 3 Mar 2008 at 15:53, Richard wrote:
>> Antoninus Twink <> writes:
>>
>>> On 3 Mar 2008 at 14:08, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>>> In article <fqgvkj$tbf$>,
>>>> Richard <devr_@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>Oh, puhleaze.
>>>>>
>>>>>Try this:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war.../ideologue.htm
>>>>
>>>> Could be - but I'm not so sure he's all that motivated by any ideology.
>>>>
>>>> My pick would be (particularly w.r.t. his feud with Jacob): Duelist.
>>>
>>> Clc is heavy on Android/Big Dog combinations, with some Me-toos to
>>> bolster their egos.
>>>
>>> I suppose Sosman would qualify as a Big Cat.
>>
>> Guess which clc clique reg is a 100% match for this type:
>>
>> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war...rouscranus.htm
>
> Ha ha, that's truly uncanny!
>
> I'd expected him to match the description of Netiquette Nazi as well,
> but he's more of a boring old grandad complaining away in the corner
> than a Miss Whiplash!

You got the CBF reference then :-; And the philosopher there is most
definitely KT trying patiently to explain to Chuck why he is so wrong yet
again. Uncanny.

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:56:38 -0600, Richard wrote
(in article <fqhoma$gn6$>):

> Antoninus Twink <> writes:
>
>> On 3 Mar 2008 at 15:53, Richard wrote:
>>> Antoninus Twink <> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 3 Mar 2008 at 14:08, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>>>> In article <fqgvkj$tbf$>,
>>>>> Richard <devr_@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Oh, puhleaze.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war.../ideologue.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> Could be - but I'm not so sure he's all that motivated by any ideology.
>>>>>
>>>>> My pick would be (particularly w.r.t. his feud with Jacob): Duelist.
>>>>
>>>> Clc is heavy on Android/Big Dog combinations, with some Me-toos to
>>>> bolster their egos.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose Sosman would qualify as a Big Cat.
>>>
>>> Guess which clc clique reg is a 100% match for this type:
>>>
>>> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war...rouscranus.htm
>>
>> Ha ha, that's truly uncanny!
>>
>> I'd expected him to match the description of Netiquette Nazi as well,
>> but he's more of a boring old grandad complaining away in the corner
>> than a Miss Whiplash!
>
> You got the CBF reference then :-; And the philosopher there is most
> definitely KT trying patiently to explain to Chuck why he is so wrong yet
> again. Uncanny.
>

Dare I mention:
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war...quettenazi.htm


--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

Randy Howard wrote:
> Richard wrote
>> Antoninus Twink <> writes:
>>> Richard wrote:
>>>> Antoninus Twink <> writes:
>>>>> Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>>>>> Richard <devr_@gmail.com> wrote:
>
.... snip troll garbage ...
>
> Dare I mention:
> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war...quettenazi.htm

Do you realize that there are six successive troll posts preceding
your reply? Why encourage them?

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On 3 Mar 2008 at 23:35, CBFalconer wrote:
> Randy Howard wrote:
>> Richard wrote
>>> Antoninus Twink <> writes:
>>>> Richard wrote:
>>>>> Antoninus Twink <> writes:
>>>>>> Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>>>>>> Richard <devr_@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Guess which clc clique reg is a 100% match for this type:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war...rouscranus.htm
>>>>
>>>> Ha ha, that's truly uncanny!
>>>>
>>>> I'd expected him to match the description of Netiquette Nazi as
>>>> well,
>>>> but he's more of a boring old grandad complaining away in the corner
>>>> than a Miss Whiplash!
>>>
>>> You got the CBF reference then :-; And the philosopher there is most
>>> definitely KT trying patiently to explain to Chuck why he is so wrong
>>> yet again. Uncanny.
>>
>>
>> Dare I mention:
>> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war...quettenazi.htm
>
> Do you realize that there are six successive troll posts preceding
> your reply? Why encourage them?

Ooh, did we touch a nerve there?!

Of course, there's only one Godfather in any group - no prizes for
guessing who clc's is, or who his loyal henchmen are.

Antoninus Twink <> writes:

> On 3 Mar 2008 at 23:35, CBFalconer wrote:
>> Randy Howard wrote:
>>> Richard wrote
>>>> Antoninus Twink <> writes:
>>>>> Richard wrote:
>>>>>> Antoninus Twink <> writes:
>>>>>>> Kenny McCormack wrote:
>>>>>>>> Richard <devr_@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Guess which clc clique reg is a 100% match for this type:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war...rouscranus.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> Ha ha, that's truly uncanny!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd expected him to match the description of Netiquette Nazi as
>>>>> well,
>>>>> but he's more of a boring old grandad complaining away in the corner
>>>>> than a Miss Whiplash!
>>>>
>>>> You got the CBF reference then :-; And the philosopher there is most
>>>> definitely KT trying patiently to explain to Chuck why he is so wrong
>>>> yet again. Uncanny.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dare I mention:
>>> http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war...quettenazi.htm
>>
>> Do you realize that there are six successive troll posts preceding
>> your reply? Why encourage them?
>
> Ooh, did we touch a nerve there?!
>
> Of course, there's only one Godfather in any group - no prizes for
> guessing who clc's is, or who his loyal henchmen are.

That's funny. But even funnier is that I can think of at least 3 posters
who will all think you mean them!

http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war.../godfather.htm