Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Windows 64bit > Re: Hiding Vista volumes from XP (volsnap.sys issue revisited)

Reply
Thread Tools

Re: Hiding Vista volumes from XP (volsnap.sys issue revisited)

 
 
R. C. White
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2008
Hi, Colin.

Great job! At least, I think so. But I haven't really absorbed the whole
"Greypaper" - and this whole thread - yet because I don't really have that
issue. I've used System Restore only a few times, and I seldom boot into
WinXP anymore.

But right there in Setup One is one of my pet peeves. :>(

<paste>
In other words, I boot into XP Pro x86 to rename its system volume, and then
XP Pro x64 to name its system volume, etc.
Example: for my quad-boot AMD test box I name the system volumes as follows:
"XP Pro x86", "XP Pro x6", "Vista x86", "Vista x64".
</paste>

I agree wholeheartedly with your advice to rename those volumes! But those
are the BOOT volumes, not the SYSTEM volumes. Remember, those terms are
counterintuitive, based on legacy issues that go back at least 20 years. As
many authors have pointed out, we BOOT from the SYSTEM partition and keep
the operating SYSTEM files in the BOOT volume.

When this comes up in these newsgroups, I usually refer the poster to KB
article 314470:
Definitions for system volume and boot volume
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314470/EN-US/

As that article says, "There is only one system volume. However, there is
one boot volume for each operating system in a multiboot system." If you
just change "system volume" to "boot volume" each time it occurs in that
paragraph, I won't quibble any more. ;^}

RC
--
R. C. White, CPA
San Marcos, TX
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/(E-Mail Removed)
Microsoft Windows MVP
(Running Windows Live Mail 2008 in Vista Ultimate x64 SP1)

"Colin Barnhorst" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> There is still lots of confusion about the incompatibility between XP and
> Vista that leads to the loss of Vista's recovery options when
> multi-booting
> Vista and XP. I have prepared a Greypaper (it would be a whitepaper if I
> just knew what I was doing ) for those interested or needing to resolve
> the problem on their own computers. The attachment is based on my own
> notes
> in securing my test box from this problem. I multi-boot XP Pro x86, XP
> Pro
> x64, Vista x86, and Vista x64 so the example in the Greypaper is for more
> than just dual-booting.
>
> The attachment is in Word .doc format so any edition of Word or the Word
> Viewer (free download from Office Downloads) will do as well as Open
> Office,
> etc.
>
> Before you net-police start posting replies about "back up everything
> first", its all in the doc already.
>
> Feel free to use the attachment as you want, including modifying,
> reposting,
> etc.
>
> OK, all you flamers, let me have it.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
R. C. White
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2008
Whoops!

> But right there in Setup One is one of my pet peeves. :>(


Make that Step One. (It's really embarrassing to goof up while
criticizing.)

RC
--
R. C. White, CPA
San Marcos, TX
(E-Mail Removed)
Microsoft Windows MVP
(Running Windows Live Mail 2008 in Vista Ultimate x64 SP1)

"R. C. White" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi, Colin.
>
> Great job! At least, I think so. But I haven't really absorbed the whole
> "Greypaper" - and this whole thread - yet because I don't really have that
> issue. I've used System Restore only a few times, and I seldom boot into
> WinXP anymore.
>
> But right there in Setup One is one of my pet peeves. :>(

<SNIP>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Colin Barnhorst
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2008
LOL. Thanks for the correction.

"R. C. White" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Whoops!
>
>> But right there in Setup One is one of my pet peeves. :>(

>
> Make that Step One. (It's really embarrassing to goof up while
> criticizing.)
>
> RC
> --
> R. C. White, CPA
> San Marcos, TX
> (E-Mail Removed)
> Microsoft Windows MVP
> (Running Windows Live Mail 2008 in Vista Ultimate x64 SP1)
>
> "R. C. White" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Hi, Colin.
>>
>> Great job! At least, I think so. But I haven't really absorbed the
>> whole "Greypaper" - and this whole thread - yet because I don't really
>> have that issue. I've used System Restore only a few times, and I seldom
>> boot into WinXP anymore.
>>
>> But right there in Setup One is one of my pet peeves. :>(

> <SNIP>


 
Reply With Quote
 
Colin Barnhorst
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2008
Now that I think of it, I really don't care about boot or system. I could
just as easily have said "any volume with Vista VSS files on it." After
all, a CompletePC Backup user would not keep the images on any of the system
volumes but would save them to another volume altogether. That volume would
need to be hidden from XP as well. I haven't gone into that detail in the
GP because the user needs to work that one out based on his backup plan.

"R. C. White" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi, Colin.
>
> Great job! At least, I think so. But I haven't really absorbed the whole
> "Greypaper" - and this whole thread - yet because I don't really have that
> issue. I've used System Restore only a few times, and I seldom boot into
> WinXP anymore.
>
> But right there in Setup One is one of my pet peeves. :>(
>
> <paste>
> In other words, I boot into XP Pro x86 to rename its system volume, and
> then XP Pro x64 to name its system volume, etc.
> Example: for my quad-boot AMD test box I name the system volumes as
> follows:
> "XP Pro x86", "XP Pro x6", "Vista x86", "Vista x64".
> </paste>
>
> I agree wholeheartedly with your advice to rename those volumes! But
> those are the BOOT volumes, not the SYSTEM volumes. Remember, those terms
> are counterintuitive, based on legacy issues that go back at least 20
> years. As many authors have pointed out, we BOOT from the SYSTEM
> partition and keep the operating SYSTEM files in the BOOT volume.
>
> When this comes up in these newsgroups, I usually refer the poster to KB
> article 314470:
> Definitions for system volume and boot volume
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314470/EN-US/
>
> As that article says, "There is only one system volume. However, there is
> one boot volume for each operating system in a multiboot system." If you
> just change "system volume" to "boot volume" each time it occurs in that
> paragraph, I won't quibble any more. ;^}
>
> RC
> --
> R. C. White, CPA
> San Marcos, TX
> (E-Mail Removed)
> Microsoft Windows MVP
> (Running Windows Live Mail 2008 in Vista Ultimate x64 SP1)
>
> "Colin Barnhorst" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> There is still lots of confusion about the incompatibility between XP and
>> Vista that leads to the loss of Vista's recovery options when
>> multi-booting
>> Vista and XP. I have prepared a Greypaper (it would be a whitepaper if I
>> just knew what I was doing ) for those interested or needing to resolve
>> the problem on their own computers. The attachment is based on my own
>> notes
>> in securing my test box from this problem. I multi-boot XP Pro x86, XP
>> Pro
>> x64, Vista x86, and Vista x64 so the example in the Greypaper is for more
>> than just dual-booting.
>>
>> The attachment is in Word .doc format so any edition of Word or the Word
>> Viewer (free download from Office Downloads) will do as well as Open
>> Office,
>> etc.
>>
>> Before you net-police start posting replies about "back up everything
>> first", its all in the doc already.
>>
>> Feel free to use the attachment as you want, including modifying,
>> reposting,
>> etc.
>>
>> OK, all you flamers, let me have it.

>


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Basic volumes and dynamic volumes Turtle Windows 64bit 6 08-06-2010 06:18 PM
Re: Hiding Vista volumes from XP (volsnap.sys issue revisited) Dennis Pack Windows 64bit 5 02-25-2008 04:02 PM
Re: Hiding Vista volumes from XP (volsnap.sys issue revisited) Lance Le Claire Windows 64bit 7 02-25-2008 03:49 AM
Re: Hiding Vista volumes from XP (volsnap.sys issue revisited) DevilsPGD Windows 64bit 5 02-24-2008 04:29 AM
Re: Hiding Vista volumes from XP (volsnap.sys issue revisited) Dennis Pack Windows 64bit 1 02-24-2008 02:47 AM



Advertisments