Somewhere on teh interweb Peter H. typed:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:08:27 +1300, "~misfit~"
> <> wrote:
>
>> I see that there are very few of us left crunching units for SETI
>> these days:
>>
>> http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/team_...=expavg_credit
>>
>> Has everyone given up on the search for extraterrestrial life? With
>> these modern and efficient multi-core computers it's easy to allow
>> SETI to use otherwise-unused CPU cycles. I've put my Core 2 Duo on
>> SETI and gone up from 14th place to 5th place in the team in less
>> than a month.
>
> With all due respect, you climbed so rapidly because really only two
> members have crunched any units in the last 12 months.
Hehee! I know. I also remember your gigantic contribution to SETI in the
"classic" days.
> I am impressed by your number of recent completed units though.
Yeah, thanks, and that's with me not running SETI for over a week in the
last month. This CPU really cranks them out. (I did maybe five units with a
Celeron 420, OCed to 2.13GHz I have here, then decided that it wasn't worth
the cost in electricity leaving it on). As /this/ machine is on 24/7 I
figured that, for the relatively small increase in running cost, I might as
well run SETI on it. The cooling's good, SETI runs both cores at about case
temp plus 18°C or so. With a 25cm fan built into the side of the case,
(iCute S901,
http://pcworld.co.nz/pcworld/pcw.nsf...2571ED000C70D2 )
case temp isn't far off room temp.
My current computer churns out roughly 7x the units my Barton did per day.
When you consider I started SETI with a 486 that took nigh-on three days to
do a (classic) WU and the Barton did a classic in 2 hours (or slightly less)
you can really see how far home computing has come. What took three days
with my first PC I can now do in 17 minutes.
Cheers,
Shaun.