On 19 Jul 2007 06:01:08 GMT, Gordon <> exclaimed:
>On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:04:27 +1200, Fred Dagg wrote:
>
>> On 18 Jul 2007 22:45:18 +1200, Jonathan Walker <>
>> exclaimed:
>>
>>>QUOTE:
>>>About Microsoft
>>>Founded in 1975, Microsoft (Nasdaq ?MSFT?) is the worldwide leader in
>>>software, services and Internet technologies for personal and business
>>>computing. The company offers a wide range of products and services
>>>designed to empower people through great software - any time, any place
>>>and on any device.
>>>ENDQUOTE
>>
>> If you took off your blinkers, you'd find that this is dead on the
>> money.
>
>Right then, could you explain to us why you think it is?
Perhaps you could explain why it isn't?
You could start by explaining how Microsoft doesn't dominate the
personal and business computing markets. Oh, that's right - they do.
Maybe you could then try to explain that productivity software doesn't
empower workers. Of course without Microsoft we'd probably still be on
typewriters, so that kinda kills that idea.
Maybe you don't think their software is great? Whilst that is quite
subjective, I think their success would indicate otherwise.
Maybe you don't like the "any device" thing? Fact is, there is a
version of Windows for almost any device, so that kills that. (Unless
you're going to say that because one person had a problem with their
computer and couldn't use a flash drive that Vista doesn't support
transferring files from other OSs, but I think only a moron would say
something like that).
So really, I'm quite looking forward to your explanation of why that
statement is so wrong. It would be good if you could refrain from the
usual FUD and simplistic anti-corporate attack most often used by
those that hate successful businesses and just stick to fact.
This should be interesting.
|