«

Nik Coughlin wrote:
> ~misfit~ wrote:
> > So, what was wrong? Why replace the router? I have a Speedtouch 510
> > and it's a great little router. Did yours fail?
>
> Still no idea what was wrong. We spent too much time on it and it
> wasn't worth spending any more for the price of a new one

Ahh, ok. I don't suppose it'd be any good to me as 'parts'? They're pretty
much modular aren't they? T'would be panic stations here if my router were
to fail, the budget is stretched to the limit and will be for a while yet.

Cheers,
--
Shaun.

On Jul 9, 1:02 pm, "~misfit~" <misfit6...@woohoo.com.au> wrote:
> Nik Coughlin wrote:
> > ~misfit~ wrote:
> > > So, what was wrong? Why replace the router? I have a Speedtouch 510
> > > and it's a great little router. Did yours fail?
>
> > Still no idea what was wrong. We spent too much time on it and it
> > wasn't worth spending any more for the price of a new one
>
> Ahh, ok. I don't suppose it'd be any good to me as 'parts'? They're pretty
> much modular aren't they? T'would be panic stations here if my router were
> to fail, the budget is stretched to the limit and will be for a while yet.

Send me an email, this address is valid

On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:09:18 -0700, wrote:

>On Jul 9, 1:02 pm, "~misfit~" <misfit6...@woohoo.com.au> wrote:
>> Nik Coughlin wrote:
>> > ~misfit~ wrote:
>> > > So, what was wrong? Why replace the router? I have a Speedtouch 510
>> > > and it's a great little router. Did yours fail?
>>
>> > Still no idea what was wrong. We spent too much time on it and it
>> > wasn't worth spending any more for the price of a new one
>>
>> Ahh, ok. I don't suppose it'd be any good to me as 'parts'? They're pretty
>> much modular aren't they? T'would be panic stations here if my router were
>> to fail, the budget is stretched to the limit and will be for a while yet.
>
>Send me an email, this address is valid



Never post with a Valid e-mail address..

On Jul 9, 4:20 pm, Greg House
<gho...@yabadabado.cnn wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:09:18 -0700, nrkn....@gmail.com wrote:
> >On Jul 9, 1:02 pm, "~misfit~" <misfit6...@woohoo.com.au> wrote:
> >> Nik Coughlin wrote:
> >> > ~misfit~ wrote:
> >> > > So, what was wrong? Why replace the router? I have a Speedtouch 510
> >> > > and it's a great little router. Did yours fail?
>
> >> > Still no idea what was wrong. We spent too much time on it and it
> >> > wasn't worth spending any more for the price of a new one
>
> >> Ahh, ok. I don't suppose it'd be any good to me as 'parts'? They're pretty
> >> much modular aren't they? T'would be panic stations here if my router were
> >> to fail, the budget is stretched to the limit and will be for a while yet.
>
> >Send me an email, this address is valid
>
> Never post with a Valid e-mail address..

Why not? Gmail spam filters are awesome. I get a couple of pieces of
spam a month maximum to my inbox.

Greg House < wrote:

> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:09:18 -0700, wrote:
>
>>On Jul 9, 1:02 pm, "~misfit~" <misfit6...@woohoo.com.au> wrote:
>>> Nik Coughlin wrote:
>>> > ~misfit~ wrote:
>>> > > So, what was wrong? Why replace the router? I have a Speedtouch 510
>>> > > and it's a great little router. Did yours fail?
>>>
>>> > Still no idea what was wrong. We spent too much time on it and it
>>> > wasn't worth spending any more for the price of a new one
>>>
>>> Ahh, ok. I don't suppose it'd be any good to me as 'parts'? They're
>>> pretty much modular aren't they? T'would be panic stations here if my
>>> router were to fail, the budget is stretched to the limit and will be
>>> for a while yet.
>>
>>Send me an email, this address is valid
>
>
>
> Never post with a Valid e-mail address..

I do, have done so for a couple of years now.

--
Q: What is hallucinogenic and exists for every group with order divisible by
p^k?
A: A psilocybin p-subgroup.

wrote:
> On Jul 9, 4:20 pm, Greg House
> <gho...@yabadabado.cnn wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:09:18 -0700, nrkn....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Jul 9, 1:02 pm, "~misfit~" <misfit6...@woohoo.com.au> wrote:
> > > > Nik Coughlin wrote:
> > > > > ~misfit~ wrote:
> > > > > > So, what was wrong? Why replace the router? I have a
> > > > > > Speedtouch 510 and it's a great little router. Did yours
> > > > > > fail?
> >
> > > > > Still no idea what was wrong. We spent too much time on it
> > > > > and it wasn't worth spending any more for the price of a new
> > > > > one
> >
> > > > Ahh, ok. I don't suppose it'd be any good to me as 'parts'?
> > > > They're pretty much modular aren't they? T'would be panic
> > > > stations here if my router were to fail, the budget is
> > > > stretched to the limit and will be for a while yet.
> >
> > > Send me an email, this address is valid
> >
> > Never post with a Valid e-mail address..
>
> Why not? Gmail spam filters are awesome. I get a couple of pieces of
> spam a month maximum to my inbox.

I agree. I actually haven't seen one spam in my gmail inbox and I've posted
it in newsgroups before.

Email sent.
--
Shaun.

~misfit~ wrote:
> wrote:
>> On Jul 9, 4:20 pm, Greg House
>> <gho...@yabadabado.cnn wrote:
>>> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:09:18 -0700, nrkn....@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Send me an email, this address is valid
>>>
>>> Never post with a Valid e-mail address..
>>
>> Why not? Gmail spam filters are awesome. I get a couple of pieces
>> of spam a month maximum to my inbox.
>
> I agree. I actually haven't seen one spam in my gmail inbox and I've
> posted it in newsgroups before.

I get hundreds of spam a day in my gmail spam folder, but I have several
different email addresses that all redirect to my gmail, and most of them
are on websites, Usenet, etc. I skim them before deleting and have only
ever had a couple of false positives. Very impressed indeed.

Nik Coughlin wrote:
> ~misfit~ wrote:
> > wrote:
> > > On Jul 9, 4:20 pm, Greg House
> > > <gho...@yabadabado.cnn wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:09:18 -0700, nrkn....@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Send me an email, this address is valid
> > > >
> > > > Never post with a Valid e-mail address..
> > >
> > > Why not? Gmail spam filters are awesome. I get a couple of
> > > pieces of spam a month maximum to my inbox.
> >
> > I agree. I actually haven't seen one spam in my gmail inbox and I've
> > posted it in newsgroups before.
>
> I get hundreds of spam a day in my gmail spam folder, but I have
> several different email addresses that all redirect to my gmail, and
> most of them are on websites, Usenet, etc. I skim them before
> deleting and have only ever had a couple of false positives. Very
> impressed indeed.

Yes. Actually, I've never looked in my Gmail spam folder, must do it I
guess.
--
Shaun.