«

On May 24, 7:44 am, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> JohnO wrote:
> > On May 23, 8:32 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> >> JohnO wrote:
> >> > On May 23, 11:29 am, Adam Cameron <adam_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>> And automatically ***RADIATION*** is always bad!!!!!
> >> >> >>> Its not what I would put in a healthy diet..
>
> >> >> >> It's everywhere. You cannot avoid it. All transmitting devices do
> >> >> >> is encode data into the radiation.
>
> >> >> >> Light is a form of radiation.
> >> >> >> So is sound (although not electromagnatic).
> >> >> >> Do you want to ban all magnets too?
>
> >> >> >> We couldn't live without radiation. It's essential.
> >> >> > *sigh*
>
> >> >> What are you *sighing* about? He's RIGHT.
>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Adam
>
> >> > Shane emits a *sigh* when he's trying to hide the fact that he has no
> >> > intelligent reply.
>
> >> JohnO have you ever had an intelligent reply?
>
> > Not from you.
>
> *sigh*

See what I mean?

> not only can you not manage an intelligent reply, you cannot even work
> usenet properly.
> A new thread for every response you posted, can you do nothing right?

If you looked a little closer you would have seen that it's a Google
Groups issue.

But then again, I wouldn't expect you to be able to work that out.

JohnO wrote:

> On May 24, 7:44 am, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> JohnO wrote:
>> > On May 23, 8:32 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> >> JohnO wrote:
>> >> > On May 23, 11:29 am, Adam Cameron <adam_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> And automatically ***RADIATION*** is always bad!!!!!
>> >> >> >>> Its not what I would put in a healthy diet..
>>
>> >> >> >> It's everywhere. You cannot avoid it. All transmitting devices
>> >> >> >> do is encode data into the radiation.
>>
>> >> >> >> Light is a form of radiation.
>> >> >> >> So is sound (although not electromagnatic).
>> >> >> >> Do you want to ban all magnets too?
>>
>> >> >> >> We couldn't live without radiation. It's essential.
>> >> >> > *sigh*
>>
>> >> >> What are you *sighing* about? He's RIGHT.
>>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Adam
>>
>> >> > Shane emits a *sigh* when he's trying to hide the fact that he has
>> >> > no intelligent reply.
>>
>> >> JohnO have you ever had an intelligent reply?
>>
>> > Not from you.
>>
>> *sigh*
>
> See what I mean?
>
>> not only can you not manage an intelligent reply, you cannot even work
>> usenet properly.
>> A new thread for every response you posted, can you do nothing right?
>
> If you looked a little closer you would have seen that it's a Google
> Groups issue.
>
> But then again, I wouldn't expect you to be able to work that out.

A crap tradesman *always* blames his tools, just ask people who dont look at
references headers

--
Q: What does a mathematician present to his fiancée when he wants to
propose?
A: A polynomial ring!

On May 24, 6:41 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> JohnO wrote:
> > On May 24, 7:44 am, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> >> JohnO wrote:
> >> > On May 23, 8:32 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> >> >> JohnO wrote:
> >> >> > On May 23, 11:29 am, Adam Cameron <adam_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>> And automatically ***RADIATION*** is always bad!!!!!
> >> >> >> >>> Its not what I would put in a healthy diet..
>
> >> >> >> >> It's everywhere. You cannot avoid it. All transmitting devices
> >> >> >> >> do is encode data into the radiation.
>
> >> >> >> >> Light is a form of radiation.
> >> >> >> >> So is sound (although not electromagnatic).
> >> >> >> >> Do you want to ban all magnets too?
>
> >> >> >> >> We couldn't live without radiation. It's essential.
> >> >> >> > *sigh*
>
> >> >> >> What are you *sighing* about? He's RIGHT.
>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> Adam
>
> >> >> > Shane emits a *sigh* when he's trying to hide the fact that he has
> >> >> > no intelligent reply.
>
> >> >> JohnO have you ever had an intelligent reply?
>
> >> > Not from you.
>
> >> *sigh*
>
> > See what I mean?
>
> >> not only can you not manage an intelligent reply, you cannot even work
> >> usenet properly.
> >> A new thread for every response you posted, can you do nothing right?
>
> > If you looked a little closer you would have seen that it's a Google
> > Groups issue.
>
> > But then again, I wouldn't expect you to be able to work that out.
>
> A crap tradesman *always* blames his tools, just ask people who dont look at
> references headers
>

Typical Shane behaviour: Getting toasted on the OT discussion, so he
attempts to drag the focus away into a discussion about usenet
threading. We've come to recognise your little admissions of defeat,
loser.

JohnO wrote:

> On May 24, 6:41 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> JohnO wrote:
>> > On May 24, 7:44 am, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> >> JohnO wrote:
>> >> > On May 23, 8:32 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> >> >> JohnO wrote:
>> >> >> > On May 23, 11:29 am, Adam Cameron <adam_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>> And automatically ***RADIATION*** is always bad!!!!!
>> >> >> >> >>> Its not what I would put in a healthy diet..
>>
>> >> >> >> >> It's everywhere. You cannot avoid it. All transmitting
>> >> >> >> >> devices do is encode data into the radiation.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Light is a form of radiation.
>> >> >> >> >> So is sound (although not electromagnatic).
>> >> >> >> >> Do you want to ban all magnets too?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> We couldn't live without radiation. It's essential.
>> >> >> >> > *sigh*
>>
>> >> >> >> What are you *sighing* about? He's RIGHT.
>>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Adam
>>
>> >> >> > Shane emits a *sigh* when he's trying to hide the fact that he
>> >> >> > has no intelligent reply.
>>
>> >> >> JohnO have you ever had an intelligent reply?
>>
>> >> > Not from you.
>>
>> >> *sigh*
>>
>> > See what I mean?
>>
>> >> not only can you not manage an intelligent reply, you cannot even work
>> >> usenet properly.
>> >> A new thread for every response you posted, can you do nothing right?
>>
>> > If you looked a little closer you would have seen that it's a Google
>> > Groups issue.
>>
>> > But then again, I wouldn't expect you to be able to work that out.
>>
>> A crap tradesman *always* blames his tools, just ask people who dont look
>> at references headers
>>
>
> Typical Shane behaviour: Getting toasted on the OT discussion, so he
> attempts to drag the focus away into a discussion about usenet
> threading. We've come to recognise your little admissions of defeat,
> loser.

????????????????
Take a pill

--
Q: What is often used by Canadians to help solve certain differential
equations?
A: the Lacrosse transform.

On May 24, 7:55 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> JohnO wrote:
> > On May 24, 6:41 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> >> JohnO wrote:
> >> > On May 24, 7:44 am, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> >> >> JohnO wrote:
> >> >> > On May 23, 8:32 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> JohnO wrote:
> >> >> >> > On May 23, 11:29 am, Adam Cameron <adam_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>>> And automatically ***RADIATION*** is always bad!!!!!
> >> >> >> >> >>> Its not what I would put in a healthy diet..
>
> >> >> >> >> >> It's everywhere. You cannot avoid it. All transmitting
> >> >> >> >> >> devices do is encode data into the radiation.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Light is a form of radiation.
> >> >> >> >> >> So is sound (although not electromagnatic).
> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want to ban all magnets too?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> We couldn't live without radiation. It's essential.
> >> >> >> >> > *sigh*
>
> >> >> >> >> What are you *sighing* about? He's RIGHT.
>
> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >> Adam
>
> >> >> >> > Shane emits a *sigh* when he's trying to hide the fact that he
> >> >> >> > has no intelligent reply.
>
> >> >> >> JohnO have you ever had an intelligent reply?
>
> >> >> > Not from you.
>
> >> >> *sigh*
>
> >> > See what I mean?
>
> >> >> not only can you not manage an intelligent reply, you cannot even work
> >> >> usenet properly.
> >> >> A new thread for every response you posted, can you do nothing right?
>
> >> > If you looked a little closer you would have seen that it's a Google
> >> > Groups issue.
>
> >> > But then again, I wouldn't expect you to be able to work that out.
>
> >> A crap tradesman *always* blames his tools, just ask people who dont look
> >> at references headers
>
> > Typical Shane behaviour: Getting toasted on the OT discussion, so he
> > attempts to drag the focus away into a discussion about usenet
> > threading. We've come to recognise your little admissions of defeat,
> > loser.
>
> ????????????????
> Take a pill
>

Yes, we get the idea already. No need to keep giving us more examples.
I expect a *sigh* eny minute now.

JohnO wrote:

> On May 24, 7:55 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> JohnO wrote:
>> > On May 24, 6:41 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> >> JohnO wrote:
>> >> > On May 24, 7:44 am, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> >> >> JohnO wrote:
>> >> >> > On May 23, 8:32 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> JohnO wrote:
>> >> >> >> > On May 23, 11:29 am, Adam Cameron <adam_j...@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>>> And automatically ***RADIATION*** is always bad!!!!!
>> >> >> >> >> >>> Its not what I would put in a healthy diet..
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> It's everywhere. You cannot avoid it. All transmitting
>> >> >> >> >> >> devices do is encode data into the radiation.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Light is a form of radiation.
>> >> >> >> >> >> So is sound (although not electromagnatic).
>> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want to ban all magnets too?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> We couldn't live without radiation. It's essential.
>> >> >> >> >> > *sigh*
>>
>> >> >> >> >> What are you *sighing* about? He's RIGHT.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> Adam
>>
>> >> >> >> > Shane emits a *sigh* when he's trying to hide the fact that he
>> >> >> >> > has no intelligent reply.
>>
>> >> >> >> JohnO have you ever had an intelligent reply?
>>
>> >> >> > Not from you.
>>
>> >> >> *sigh*
>>
>> >> > See what I mean?
>>
>> >> >> not only can you not manage an intelligent reply, you cannot even
>> >> >> work usenet properly.
>> >> >> A new thread for every response you posted, can you do nothing
>> >> >> right?
>>
>> >> > If you looked a little closer you would have seen that it's a Google
>> >> > Groups issue.
>>
>> >> > But then again, I wouldn't expect you to be able to work that out.
>>
>> >> A crap tradesman *always* blames his tools, just ask people who dont
>> >> look at references headers
>>
>> > Typical Shane behaviour: Getting toasted on the OT discussion, so he
>> > attempts to drag the focus away into a discussion about usenet
>> > threading. We've come to recognise your little admissions of defeat,
>> > loser.
>>
>> ????????????????
>> Take a pill
>>
>
> Yes, we get the idea already. No need to keep giving us more examples.
> I expect a *sigh* eny minute now.

What planet are you on?

--
Q: What did the constipated mathematician do?
A: He worked it out with a pencil!

On May 24, 8:24 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> JohnO wrote:
> > On May 24, 7:55 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> >> JohnO wrote:
> >> > On May 24, 6:41 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> >> >> JohnO wrote:
> >> >> > On May 24, 7:44 am, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> JohnO wrote:
> >> >> >> > On May 23, 8:32 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> JohnO wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > On May 23, 11:29 am, Adam Cameron <adam_j...@hotmail.com>
> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> And automatically ***RADIATION*** is always bad!!!!!
> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Its not what I would put in a healthy diet..
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's everywhere. You cannot avoid it. All transmitting
> >> >> >> >> >> >> devices do is encode data into the radiation.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Light is a form of radiation.
> >> >> >> >> >> >> So is sound (although not electromagnatic).
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want to ban all magnets too?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> We couldn't live without radiation. It's essential.
> >> >> >> >> >> > *sigh*
>
> >> >> >> >> >> What are you *sighing* about? He's RIGHT.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >> >> Adam
>
> >> >> >> >> > Shane emits a *sigh* when he's trying to hide the fact that he
> >> >> >> >> > has no intelligent reply.
>
> >> >> >> >> JohnO have you ever had an intelligent reply?
>
> >> >> >> > Not from you.
>
> >> >> >> *sigh*
>
> >> >> > See what I mean?
>
> >> >> >> not only can you not manage an intelligent reply, you cannot even
> >> >> >> work usenet properly.
> >> >> >> A new thread for every response you posted, can you do nothing
> >> >> >> right?
>
> >> >> > If you looked a little closer you would have seen that it's a Google
> >> >> > Groups issue.
>
> >> >> > But then again, I wouldn't expect you to be able to work that out.
>
> >> >> A crap tradesman *always* blames his tools, just ask people who dont
> >> >> look at references headers
>
> >> > Typical Shane behaviour: Getting toasted on the OT discussion, so he
> >> > attempts to drag the focus away into a discussion about usenet
> >> > threading. We've come to recognise your little admissions of defeat,
> >> > loser.
>
> >> ????????????????
> >> Take a pill
>
> > Yes, we get the idea already. No need to keep giving us more examples.
> > I expect a *sigh* eny minute now.
>
> What planet are you on?
>

I'm on the planet where WiFi radiation is understood to be harmless.

On the other hand, you are on planet Hyperbole where personal tinfoil
accessories are considered good sense.

JohnO wrote:

> On May 24, 8:24 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> JohnO wrote:
>> > On May 24, 7:55 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> >> JohnO wrote:
>> >> > On May 24, 6:41 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> >> >> JohnO wrote:
>> >> >> > On May 24, 7:44 am, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> JohnO wrote:
>> >> >> >> > On May 23, 8:32 pm, Shane <s...@weasel.is-a-geek.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> JohnO wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> > On May 23, 11:29 am, Adam Cameron <adam_j...@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> And automatically ***RADIATION*** is always bad!!!!!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Its not what I would put in a healthy diet..
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's everywhere. You cannot avoid it. All transmitting
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> devices do is encode data into the radiation.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Light is a form of radiation.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> So is sound (although not electromagnatic).
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Do you want to ban all magnets too?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> We couldn't live without radiation. It's essential.
>> >> >> >> >> >> > *sigh*
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> What are you *sighing* about? He's RIGHT.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> >> >> Adam
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > Shane emits a *sigh* when he's trying to hide the fact that
>> >> >> >> >> > he has no intelligent reply.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> JohnO have you ever had an intelligent reply?
>>
>> >> >> >> > Not from you.
>>
>> >> >> >> *sigh*
>>
>> >> >> > See what I mean?
>>
>> >> >> >> not only can you not manage an intelligent reply, you cannot
>> >> >> >> even work usenet properly.
>> >> >> >> A new thread for every response you posted, can you do nothing
>> >> >> >> right?
>>
>> >> >> > If you looked a little closer you would have seen that it's a
>> >> >> > Google Groups issue.
>>
>> >> >> > But then again, I wouldn't expect you to be able to work that
>> >> >> > out.
>>
>> >> >> A crap tradesman *always* blames his tools, just ask people who
>> >> >> dont look at references headers
>>
>> >> > Typical Shane behaviour: Getting toasted on the OT discussion, so he
>> >> > attempts to drag the focus away into a discussion about usenet
>> >> > threading. We've come to recognise your little admissions of defeat,
>> >> > loser.
>>
>> >> ????????????????
>> >> Take a pill
>>
>> > Yes, we get the idea already. No need to keep giving us more examples.
>> > I expect a *sigh* eny minute now.
>>
>> What planet are you on?
>>
>
> I'm on the planet where WiFi radiation is understood to be harmless.

really?

>
> On the other hand, you are on planet Hyperbole where personal tinfoil
> accessories are considered good sense.

And...?
--
Q: Why do mathematicians often confuse Christmas and Halloween?
A: Because Oct 31 = Dec 25.