win2k server (70-215) cram master practice test for sale

I have a examforce cram master practise test with exam cram2 content
for windows 2000 server for sale. It is for the microsoft 70-215 test.
Here's the description from their website: It's never been used.

http://www.examforce.com/customer/pr...7&cat=0&page=1

gman

And on the eigth day "gman" <> did cause the electrons
to come together and form the following words:

> I have a examforce cram master practise test with exam cram2 content
> for windows 2000 server for sale. It is for the microsoft 70-215 test.
> Here's the description from their website: It's never been used.

Yes, but have you opened it? Their licenses are non-transferrable.

http://www.examforce.com/customer/supporteula.php

Interesting situation. If you don't agree to the licensing terms, do you
have to return it to them, or can you transfer it to someone else?

--
T-Bone
MCNGP XL

TBone

"gman" <> wrote in message
news: oups.com...
>I have a examforce cram master practise test with exam cram2 content
> for windows 2000 server for sale. It is for the microsoft 70-215 test.
> Here's the description from their website: It's never been used.
>
> http://www.examforce.com/customer/pr...7&cat=0&page=1

I ain't buying nothing called crammaster, sounds kinda icky.

--
Mitch "yer such a Jameshole" S.
MCNGP XLVIII (Now do the other certs REALLY matter?)
Get yer sorry James over to www.mcngp.com

MitchS

TBone <reply2me@thenewsgroup> wrote in news:Xns97A179C2F81AAreplyhere@
207.46.248.16:

> Interesting situation. If you don't agree to the licensing terms, do you
> have to return it to them, or can you transfer it to someone else?

You bet. Easy-peasy

--
JaR
MCNGP #22
Remove hat to reply

JaR

Hmmmm....well that sucks. I can see if someone were making copies and
selling them without a license why that would be prohibited. But I'm
selling the original media and licenses so why the big deal. I'm
sending them a query to get an affirmative answer one way or another.
Interesting point on what happens if I refuse the terms of the license.
I'll keep everyone posted as to what happens.

gman

"gman" <> wrote in news:1144696045.855246.288020
@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

> Hmmmm....well that sucks. I can see if someone were making copies and
> selling them without a license why that would be prohibited. But I'm
> selling the original media and licenses so why the big deal. I'm
> sending them a query to get an affirmative answer one way or another.
> Interesting point on what happens if I refuse the terms of the license.
> I'll keep everyone posted as to what happens.

If you never used them, then return them for a refund. If you have used
them, then you agreed to the terms of the license, part of which states
that you may not resell the product. Pretty simple, really.

--
JaR
MCNGP #22
Remove hat to reply

JaR

>If you never used them, then return them for a refund. If you have used
>them, then you agreed to the terms of the license, part of which states
>that you may not resell the product. Pretty simple, really.

I've yet to see a company refund money for a return made after 30 to 60
days. I've had these things more than a year probably two. We'll see
what they say but I doubt I'm getting a refund. They sent me some cd's
in paper sleeves in a padded envelope. There was no shrink wrapped
package as is typical with most software so it's pretty hard for me to
prove I never opened the package. Almost seemed like I was buying
something from a business run out of someone's garage rather than a
professional software company.

gman

As gman once said in microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse

> Almost seemed like I was buying something from a business run
> out of someone's garage rather than a professional software
> company.

Well, with an endorsement like that, how much do you want?

kpg

"gman" <> wrote in news:1144701723.281809.132850
@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

> Almost seemed like I was buying
> something from a business run out of someone's garage rather than a
> professional software company.
>

*shrugs*

Caveat emptor.

--
JaR
MCNGP #22
Remove hat to reply

JaR

**gman's** the one who fcukin said it
<<-------------------------------->>
> ...I've had these things more than a year probably two.

And you think WE would want that OLD technology??




--
Bigus Di©kus
MCNGP Sb (Antimony)
--You can't have it....it's *mine*

Bigus Di©kus