Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > NZ Computing > Wine vs XP

Reply
Thread Tools

Wine vs XP

 
 
GraB
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-01-2006
http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0%2e9%2e5

Wine has the edge overall.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
RJ
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-01-2006
In article <>,
says...
> http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0%2e9%2e5
>
> Wine has the edge overall.


Xp has the edge due to it being 100% compatible

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
-=rjh=-
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-01-2006
RJ wrote:
> In article <>,
> says...
>> http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0%2e9%2e5
>>
>> Wine has the edge overall.

>
> Xp has the edge due to it being 100% compatible
>


Wine has the edge due to it being 100% free.

Obviously, YMMV.
 
Reply With Quote
 
MarkH
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-01-2006
GraB <> wrote in
news::

> http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0%2e9%2e5
>
> Wine has the edge overall.


I Read through the entire page and I disagree with your conclusion.

Wine has the current lead on 67 tests
Wine has a lag between 0.1 and 10.0 percent on 14 tests
Wine has a lag between 10.1 and 20.0 percent on 9 tests
Wine has a lag between 20.1 and 50.0 percent on 19 tests
Wine has a lag of more than 50.1 percent on 21 tests
Wine or XP aborted on 18 tests

So that is 67 tests where the results running on Wine are better than
the results running on WinXP. But there are 63 tests where WinXP was
ahead or Wine and 18 others where one aborted, 15 of those aborted were
Wine and 3 were WinXP. Counting the aborts we have Wine - 70 vs WinXP -
78 (on the sites numbers)

If you ignore the 18 aborted tests and just look at the rest then you
find that Wine is still behind overall by a reasonable margin. Unless
of course you are a tool and think that Wine ahead on app 'a' by 0.2%
and WinXP ahead on app 'b' by 68% would make the 2 OSs even.

Some analysis from the results

Number of apps where one OS beats the other by more than 50%:
Wine: 2
WinXP: 21

Number of apps where both scores were equal is 2, in both cases the site
called it a win for Wine, which is a falsehood. To anyone objective 2
identical scores is a tie, not a win to either. This makes the wins by
Wine only 65, not 67.

Number of apps where the win was under 1%, therefore you could argue
that the results were close enough to call it a tie (not a clear win):
Wine: 21
WinXP: 2
Therefore Wine had a lead of 1% or more on 44 tests, WinXP had a lead of
1% or more on 61 tests (and WinXP leads by a larger average margin on
those). That amounts to a very clear win to WinXP!

This is why I run Windows apps on WinXP and Linux apps on SUSE or
Knoppix.


And remember: If you want to run a Windows app on Linux with Wine, it
may not even work.


--
Mark Heyes (New Zealand)
See my pics at www.gigatech.co.nz (last updated 5-September-05)
"The person on the other side was a young woman. Very obviously a
young woman. There was no possible way she could have been mistaken
for a young man in any language, especially Braille."
Maskerade
 
Reply With Quote
 
whoisthis
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-01-2006
In article <>,
RJ <> wrote:

> In article <>,
> says...
> > http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0%2e9%2e5
> >
> > Wine has the edge overall.

>
> Xp has the edge due to it being 100% compatible
>


SSSHHHHHHH... no one is meant to know that. As soon as you need to use
these artificial benchmarks to prove a point its because in reality you
are trying to hide something far more important.
 
Reply With Quote
 
GraB
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-02-2006
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 20:44:47 GMT, MarkH <> wrote:

>GraB <> wrote in
>news: :
>
>> http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0%2e9%2e5
>>
>> Wine has the edge overall.

>
>
>And remember: If you want to run a Windows app on Linux with Wine, it
>may not even work.


I understand MS are constantly trying to prevent Windows apps from
running on wine, with each new update.
 
Reply With Quote
 
RJ
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-02-2006
In article <442ee6ca$>, says...
> RJ wrote:
> > In article <>,
> > says...
> >> http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0%2e9%2e5
> >>
> >> Wine has the edge overall.

> >
> > Xp has the edge due to it being 100% compatible
> >

>
> Wine has the edge due to it being 100% free.


No, if it cant run software it is of no consequence whether its free or
not
 
Reply With Quote
 
whoisthis
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-02-2006
In article <442ee6ca$>, -=rjh=- <>
wrote:

> RJ wrote:
> > In article <>,
> > says...
> >> http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0%2e9%2e5
> >>
> >> Wine has the edge overall.

> >
> > Xp has the edge due to it being 100% compatible
> >

>
> Wine has the edge due to it being 100% free.
>
> Obviously, YMMV.


Only if you also consider your time worth nothing too. The cost of
software and hardware over the life time of the machine is negligible
compared to the cost of wages for the person sitting at the keyboard.
 
Reply With Quote
 
-=rjh=-
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-02-2006
whoisthis wrote:
> In article <442ee6ca$>, -=rjh=- <>
> wrote:
>
>> RJ wrote:
>>> In article <>,
>>> says...
>>>> http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0%2e9%2e5
>>>>
>>>> Wine has the edge overall.
>>> Xp has the edge due to it being 100% compatible
>>>

>> Wine has the edge due to it being 100% free.
>>
>> Obviously, YMMV.

>
> Only if you also consider your time worth nothing too.


Well, the fact that I even read or post to ngs like this one is a fair
indication, don't you think?

The cost of
> software and hardware over the life time of the machine is negligible
> compared to the cost of wages for the person sitting at the keyboard.


Bloody hell! Who said anything about hardware and wages!

As I said, YMMV.
 
Reply With Quote
 
whoisthis
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-02-2006
In article <>, -=rjh=- <>
wrote:

> whoisthis wrote:
> > In article <442ee6ca$>, -=rjh=- <>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> RJ wrote:
> >>> In article <>,
> >>> says...
> >>>> http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0%2e9%2e5
> >>>>
> >>>> Wine has the edge overall.
> >>> Xp has the edge due to it being 100% compatible
> >>>
> >> Wine has the edge due to it being 100% free.
> >>
> >> Obviously, YMMV.

> >
> > Only if you also consider your time worth nothing too.

>
> Well, the fact that I even read or post to ngs like this one is a fair
> indication, don't you think?
>
> The cost of
> > software and hardware over the life time of the machine is negligible
> > compared to the cost of wages for the person sitting at the keyboard.

>
> Bloody hell! Who said anything about hardware and wages!
>
> As I said, YMMV.


Its something I see as being pushed all the time by the OSS community,
"Our software is free so its cheaper", well its called total cost of
ownership, it includes productivity, maintainence, useability, etc etc
etc.

ALL UP, this DOES NOT mean that something that is free costs less.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
libmsi.a import library from wine, and header files available(entirely free software),available for python-win32 builds under msys+wine Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Python 0 01-18-2009 08:46 PM
If Linux Is So Good Why The Need For Wine And Cedaga? Corrie Computer Support 23 10-30-2005 04:17 PM
expanding wine appreciation VINUM CANADA E-ZINE Computer Support 4 08-05-2005 12:25 AM
Porting JNI Windows under JNI LINUX + Wine ? Pasturel Jean-Louis Java 5 03-03-2004 07:50 PM
Running cabarc.exe under Wine: FCICreate() failed A. Farber Java 2 02-22-2004 09:47 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57