«

saw in harvey normans the xbox 360 - not too impressed. I guess a high res
racing game is no better than a medium one. gameplays still the same.

T'was the Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:47:33 +1300 when I remembered
"jedmeister" <> saying something like this:

>saw in harvey normans the xbox 360 - not too impressed. I guess a high res
>racing game is no better than a medium one. gameplays still the same.

Graphics have never made a game that sucked to play fun. I'm surprised
people are putting more and more effort into things like graphics,
while neglecting things like truely destructible environments (like
the real world), realistic AI (ducking being a crate doesn't count),
having less crates (FPS games without crates are like RTS games
without a dictator) etc...

The last fun game I played was the Warriors. Not so great in single
player mode, but in co-op was awesome. Great fun.
--
Cheers,

Waylon Kenning.
See my blog at http://spaces.msn.com/WaylonKenning/

which HN?

was it on a HiDef TV

the early games on every console are always crap

James

"jedmeister" <> wrote in message
news:igtJf.150955$...
> saw in harvey normans the xbox 360 - not too impressed. I guess a high
> res racing game is no better than a medium one. gameplays still the same.
>
>