«

http://translate.google.com/translat...ews_id%3D14372

Hmmm... not as good as I was hoping.

Oh well, ATI R520 is out next month, I wonder if it'll be much better?

"Daniel" <> wrote in message
news:42b8afd9$...
>
http://translate.google.com/translat...ews_id%3D14372
>
> Hmmm... not as good as I was hoping.
>
> Oh well, ATI R520 is out next month, I wonder if it'll be much better?


R520 mmmmmmm its supposed to get over 10000 in 3D Mark 05....Damn.

ardz wrote:
>>
>>Oh well, ATI R520 is out next month, I wonder if it'll be much better?
>
> R520 mmmmmmm its supposed to get over 10000 in 3D Mark 05....Damn.
>

Heh, at least it's not vaporware.

The ATI R600 (currently due for Nov/Dec 2006), supposedly has some
serious specs:

65nm
64 Shader pipelines (Vec4+Scalar)
32 TMU's
32 ROPs
128 Shader Operations per Cycle
800MHz Core
102.4 billion shader ops/sec
512GFLOPs for the shaders
2 Billion triangles/sec
25.6 Gpixels/Gtexels/sec
256-bit 512MB 1.8GHz GDDR4 Memory
57.6 GB/sec Bandwidth (at 1.8GHz)
WGF2.0 Unified Shader

But, AFAIK it's currently vaporware.

Daniel wrote:
> http://translate.google.com/translat...ews_id%3D14372
>
>
> Hmmm... not as good as I was hoping.
>
> Oh well, ATI R520 is out next month, I wonder if it'll be much better?


Correction, a more respected review here:

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2451


Not bad, not bad at all.