«

A few weeks ago I enquired about an email encryption program for a small
closed group of ludite users, basically I was after a wraper to allow
simple encrypted and authenticated document email.

I have found something that comes close to my original requesters
requirements which may be of interest to people here.

https://www.ciphirebeta.com/

It looks good and actually does most of what I wanted except it dosnt
have the Private key on a removeable media and uses a centralised store
for Public keys and Certificates.
We are also not to keen on it being a proxy between mail client and mail
server examining all all mails to determine if they are/not encrypted or
signed.
Still it has given me direction and ideas for the system they want and I
am working on it still.


--
>>Follow ups may be set to a single group when appropriate!
================================================== ====================
| Local 40.9000°S, 174.9830°E |
================================================== ====================
"I used to jog, but the ice kept bouncing out of my glass."
Fools ignore complexity. Pragmatists suffer it. Some can avoid it.
Geniuses remove it

Collector»NZ wrote:

> A few weeks ago I enquired about an email encryption program for a small
> closed group of ludite users, basically I was after a wraper to allow
> simple encrypted and authenticated document email.
>
> I have found something that comes close to my original requesters
> requirements which may be of interest to people here.
>

Whats wrong with just getting certs and using smime built into most email programs?

Richard said the following on 24/01/2005 5:31 p.m.:
> Collector»NZ wrote:
>
>> A few weeks ago I enquired about an email encryption program for a
>> small closed group of ludite users, basically I was after a wraper to
>> allow simple encrypted and authenticated document email.
>>
>> I have found something that comes close to my original requesters
>> requirements which may be of interest to people here.
>>
>
> Whats wrong with just getting certs and using smime built into most
> email programs?
Dosnt suit my requester who wants a closed group situation, IE no cert
issuers, group control of keys and revocation. General PKI is not
acceptable in the situation the have.

--
>>Follow ups may be set to a single group when appropriate!
================================================== ====================
| Local 40.9000°S, 174.9830°E |
================================================== ====================
"I used to jog, but the ice kept bouncing out of my glass."
Fools ignore complexity. Pragmatists suffer it. Some can avoid it.
Geniuses remove it