On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:29:30 +1300, "E. Scrooge" <scrooge@*shot.co.nz
(*sling)> had this to say:
>
>"impossible" <> wrote in message
>news:...
>> "E. Scrooge" <scrooge@*shot.co.nz (*sling)> wrote in message
>> news:1106417542.612251@ftpsrv1...
>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >Easier to just turn the wall switch off as well. It's not going to
>>>> >start
>>>> >without power.
>>>> >
>>>> Whilst that is true, it only addresses the symptoms, not the cause.
>>>
>>> The cause is hardly a problem.
>>>
>>
>> ???? It's a problem for the OP -- not to mention anyone else who's the
>> least bit curious.
>
>It's a feature of XP. It's not a problem that will do any harm. If it
>helps get people into the habit of turning things off at the wall as well,
>then all the better. Which is all the OP really has to do when not using
>the computer to prevent it from coming back on every time that the phone
>rings.
>
>E. Scrooge
>
It's not a feature of XP at all. It's a setting in BIOS.
And why should people have to turn their computers off at the wall?
Sure, it is better to do that (power surges, etc, esp when using a
Hyena PSU), but that is a pretty ridiculous statement - "make the
computer do something really annoying to try to get the user to do
something to stop it, which is indirectly a better practice,
anyway"...
Do you turn your dishwasher, microwave, TV and Video off at the wall
when you're not using them? Maybe they should make your TV turn on
randomly when not unplugged from the wall. It wont be a fault, of
course, as it's just to try to convince people to turn it off at the
wall when not in use...
|