Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Wireless Networking > Netwok Visibility

Reply
Thread Tools

Netwok Visibility

 
 
Dennis Jelavic
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-12-2005
I have three computers, A (XP), B (XP) and C (Win2K) connected via an ad hoc
wireless network. Each is configured to dynamically obtain IP addresses from
a wireless router. Machine B has in addition to its wireless network adapter
a NIC through which it is connected to a fourth machine D (NT 4 Server) via
a cross over cable. The NIC on B has a static IP address of 192.168.0.51 and
the NIC on D has a static IP address of 192.168.0.52

When the cable is connecting B with D, machine B can see D but can't see any
of the machines on the wireless network. When the cable between B and D is
disconnected, B can see the wireless network, but of course can't see D.

How do I get machine B to see the wireless network and the wired network
simultaneously?



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
mikeFNB
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-12-2005
i think the answer lies with setting all machines to obtain to obtain ip
automatically from the router, even the additional second cards.

http://www.ezlan.net/

that should help somewhere.

mike

"Dennis Jelavic" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:u%(E-Mail Removed)...
> I have three computers, A (XP), B (XP) and C (Win2K) connected via an ad

hoc
> wireless network. Each is configured to dynamically obtain IP addresses

from
> a wireless router. Machine B has in addition to its wireless network

adapter
> a NIC through which it is connected to a fourth machine D (NT 4 Server)

via
> a cross over cable. The NIC on B has a static IP address of 192.168.0.51

and
> the NIC on D has a static IP address of 192.168.0.52
>
> When the cable is connecting B with D, machine B can see D but can't see

any
> of the machines on the wireless network. When the cable between B and D is
> disconnected, B can see the wireless network, but of course can't see D.
>
> How do I get machine B to see the wireless network and the wired network
> simultaneously?
>
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
S. Pidgorny
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-13-2005
Easy:

* Use separate Ip ranges for your wireless and wired networks
* Make sure wireless NIC starts _after_ wired one (this one is easy to test)
* Do not use default gateway setting on the wired Ethernet connection

--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MVP, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-


"Dennis Jelavic" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:u#(E-Mail Removed)...
> I have three computers, A (XP), B (XP) and C (Win2K) connected via an ad

hoc
> wireless network. Each is configured to dynamically obtain IP addresses

from
> a wireless router. Machine B has in addition to its wireless network

adapter
> a NIC through which it is connected to a fourth machine D (NT 4 Server)

via
> a cross over cable. The NIC on B has a static IP address of 192.168.0.51

and
> the NIC on D has a static IP address of 192.168.0.52
>
> When the cable is connecting B with D, machine B can see D but can't see

any
> of the machines on the wireless network. When the cable between B and D is
> disconnected, B can see the wireless network, but of course can't see D.
>
> How do I get machine B to see the wireless network and the wired network
> simultaneously?
>
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Robert Jacobs
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-13-2005
If you are using a wireless router you are not in Ad-Hoc mode. You can not
obtaing a DHCP IP if you are in ad-Hoc Mode.

Ad-Hoc is for nrtworking computers together without an AP/Router/Switch.
"Dennis Jelavic" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:u%(E-Mail Removed)...
>I have three computers, A (XP), B (XP) and C (Win2K) connected via an ad
>hoc wireless network. Each is configured to dynamically obtain IP addresses
>from a wireless router. Machine B has in addition to its wireless network
>adapter a NIC through which it is connected to a fourth machine D (NT 4
>Server) via a cross over cable. The NIC on B has a static IP address of
>192.168.0.51 and the NIC on D has a static IP address of 192.168.0.52
>
> When the cable is connecting B with D, machine B can see D but can't see
> any of the machines on the wireless network. When the cable between B and
> D is disconnected, B can see the wireless network, but of course can't see
> D.
>
> How do I get machine B to see the wireless network and the wired network
> simultaneously?
>
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Dennis Jelavic
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-14-2005


Thanks for the suggestions. I allocated static addresses 172.16.0.51 and
172.16.0.52 to the two ethernet cards and that problem was resolved. However
Svyatoslav, I didn't understand your comment to ensure "wireless NIC starts
_after_ wired one". The wireless addresses are allocated automatically and I
have no control over them!

However I have now encountered a new problem. In trying to define a bridge
across the wired and wireless networks I encounter an error telling me that
I "must select at least two LAN or High Speed Internet connections that are
not being used by Internet Connection Sharing". In fact I had selected the
two icons on the Network Connections panel for the Wireless Network
Connection and the local Area Connection and I had ensured that Internet
Connection Sharing and Firewall were turned off for both connections. Any
ideas on what is preventing bridging of the two networks.

Thanks to all the respondents to my initial posting.

By the way, the wireless network was in fact operating in "Infrastructure"
mode not "Ad Hoc" mode as I originally stated.

Dennis Jelavic



"S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Easy:
>
> * Use separate Ip ranges for your wireless and wired networks
> * Make sure (this one is easy to test)
> * Do not use default gateway setting on the wired Ethernet connection
>
> --
> Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MVP, MCSE
> -= F1 is the key =-
>
>
> "Dennis Jelavic" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:u#(E-Mail Removed)...
>> I have three computers, A (XP), B (XP) and C (Win2K) connected via an ad

> hoc
>> wireless network. Each is configured to dynamically obtain IP addresses

> from
>> a wireless router. Machine B has in addition to its wireless network

> adapter
>> a NIC through which it is connected to a fourth machine D (NT 4 Server)

> via
>> a cross over cable. The NIC on B has a static IP address of 192.168.0.51

> and
>> the NIC on D has a static IP address of 192.168.0.52
>>
>> When the cable is connecting B with D, machine B can see D but can't see

> any
>> of the machines on the wireless network. When the cable between B and D
>> is
>> disconnected, B can see the wireless network, but of course can't see D.
>>
>> How do I get machine B to see the wireless network and the wired network
>> simultaneously?
>>
>>
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Robert Jacobs
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-14-2005
In order to make a bridge, you must have two connections to combine. Two
side of a bridge, get it????? What two connections are you trying to
bridge?????? your wireless connection and wired connection? I dont think
that will work.... you know, forget about that.

Reading your post why not use the router for your network completly. connect
machine D into an ethernet port on your wireless router and let all
computers recieve IPs via DHCP.

Then you will have complete network access. If you dont want machines A and
C to beable to log into machine D, thats simple enough to use a firewall to
block the IPs on those machines.

Robert....

"Dennis Jelavic" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. I allocated static addresses 172.16.0.51 and
> 172.16.0.52 to the two ethernet cards and that problem was resolved.
> However Svyatoslav, I didn't understand your comment to ensure "wireless
> NIC starts _after_ wired one". The wireless addresses are allocated
> automatically and I have no control over them!
>
> However I have now encountered a new problem. In trying to define a bridge
> across the wired and wireless networks I encounter an error telling me
> that I "must select at least two LAN or High Speed Internet connections
> that are not being used by Internet Connection Sharing". In fact I had
> selected the two icons on the Network Connections panel for the Wireless
> Network Connection and the local Area Connection and I had ensured that
> Internet Connection Sharing and Firewall were turned off for both
> connections. Any ideas on what is preventing bridging of the two networks.
>
> Thanks to all the respondents to my initial posting.
>
> By the way, the wireless network was in fact operating in "Infrastructure"
> mode not "Ad Hoc" mode as I originally stated.
>
> Dennis Jelavic
>
>
>
> "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Easy:
>>
>> * Use separate Ip ranges for your wireless and wired networks
>> * Make sure (this one is easy to test)
>> * Do not use default gateway setting on the wired Ethernet connection
>>
>> --
>> Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MVP, MCSE
>> -= F1 is the key =-
>>
>>
>> "Dennis Jelavic" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:u#(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> I have three computers, A (XP), B (XP) and C (Win2K) connected via an ad

>> hoc
>>> wireless network. Each is configured to dynamically obtain IP addresses

>> from
>>> a wireless router. Machine B has in addition to its wireless network

>> adapter
>>> a NIC through which it is connected to a fourth machine D (NT 4 Server)

>> via
>>> a cross over cable. The NIC on B has a static IP address of 192.168.0.51

>> and
>>> the NIC on D has a static IP address of 192.168.0.52
>>>
>>> When the cable is connecting B with D, machine B can see D but can't see

>> any
>>> of the machines on the wireless network. When the cable between B and D
>>> is
>>> disconnected, B can see the wireless network, but of course can't see D.
>>>
>>> How do I get machine B to see the wireless network and the wired network
>>> simultaneously?
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
S. Pidgorny
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-14-2005
G'day:

"Robert Jacobs" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> In order to make a bridge, you must have two connections to combine. Two
> side of a bridge, get it????? What two connections are you trying to
> bridge?????? your wireless connection and wired connection? I dont think
> that will work.... you know, forget about that.


I believe Dennis means a router when talking about a bridge. Although it is
possible to configura the XP system as a router and use static routes on
other computers so that they know where to send traffic for the 172-whatever
network, I would agree to your suggestions: Dennis need simpler network.

--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MVP, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-


 
Reply With Quote
 
Dennis Jelavic
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-15-2005
Thanks to both Robert and Svyatoslav. I connected the NT Server to the
router and everything works fine now.

Dennis Jelavic


"S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:OqH%(E-Mail Removed)...
> G'day:
>
> "Robert Jacobs" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> In order to make a bridge, you must have two connections to combine. Two
>> side of a bridge, get it????? What two connections are you trying to
>> bridge?????? your wireless connection and wired connection? I dont think
>> that will work.... you know, forget about that.

>
> I believe Dennis means a router when talking about a bridge. Although it
> is
> possible to configura the XP system as a router and use static routes on
> other computers so that they know where to send traffic for the
> 172-whatever
> network, I would agree to your suggestions: Dennis need simpler network.
>
> --
> Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MVP, MCSE
> -= F1 is the key =-
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Robert Jacobs
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-15-2005
Glad to see your up....

"Dennis Jelavic" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Thanks to both Robert and Svyatoslav. I connected the NT Server to the
> router and everything works fine now.
>
> Dennis Jelavic
>
>
> "S. Pidgorny <MVP>" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:OqH%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> G'day:
>>
>> "Robert Jacobs" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> In order to make a bridge, you must have two connections to combine. Two
>>> side of a bridge, get it????? What two connections are you trying to
>>> bridge?????? your wireless connection and wired connection? I dont think
>>> that will work.... you know, forget about that.

>>
>> I believe Dennis means a router when talking about a bridge. Although it
>> is
>> possible to configura the XP system as a router and use static routes on
>> other computers so that they know where to send traffic for the
>> 172-whatever
>> network, I would agree to your suggestions: Dennis need simpler network.
>>
>> --
>> Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MVP, MCSE
>> -= F1 is the key =-
>>
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wireless netwok icon Caroline Wireless Networking 8 10-05-2008 07:46 PM
software projects ---[netwok] murali1maari@gmail.com Computer Support 1 08-20-2007 08:01 PM
Photo album software working with a netwok drive maurizio.dececco@wanadoo.fr Digital Photography 2 12-28-2005 03:06 PM
Wirless netwok XP Home Gary G Wireless Networking 0 09-20-2004 02:21 PM
Wireless Home Netwok recommendations Southern Kiwi NZ Computing 14 06-29-2004 10:23 PM



Advertisments