«

Has anyone googled "wogger" (i'm looking for a distintive domainname) I
don't think I'd want to be named after pubic hair

http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...r&defid=350986

--

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:47:25 +1300, Chris Mayhew <no^^^@no.net> wrote:

>Has anyone googled "wogger" (i'm looking for a distintive domainname) I
>don't think I'd want to be named after pubic hair
>
>http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...r&defid=350986

I thought this was some mispelt reference to Woger but that was much
funnier.

--
BOINC SETI
http://boinc.mundayweb.com/seti2/sta...1469&trans=off

DoggNZ wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:47:25 +1300, Chris Mayhew <no^^^@no.net> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone googled "wogger" (i'm looking for a distintive
>> domainname) I don't think I'd want to be named after pubic hair
>>
>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...r&defid=350986
>
> I thought this was some mispelt reference to Woger but that was much
> funnier.

So you are saying Woger is 1 g away from a pubic hair?

"cowboyz" <> wrote in message
news:cl9jln$t5d$...
> DoggNZ wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:47:25 +1300, Chris Mayhew <no^^^@no.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone googled "wogger" (i'm looking for a distintive
>>> domainname) I don't think I'd want to be named after pubic hair
>>>
>>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...r&defid=350986
>>
>> I thought this was some mispelt reference to Woger but that was much
>> funnier.
>
> So you are saying Woger is 1 g away from a pubic hair?
>
>

The adjacent orrifice

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:26:10 +1300, nick wrote:

>
> "cowboyz" <> wrote in message
> news:cl9jln$t5d$...
>> DoggNZ wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:47:25 +1300, Chris Mayhew <no^^^@no.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Has anyone googled "wogger" (i'm looking for a distintive
>>>> domainname) I don't think I'd want to be named after pubic hair
>>>>
>>>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...r&defid=350986
>>>
>>> I thought this was some mispelt reference to Woger but that was much
>>> funnier.
>>
>> So you are saying Woger is 1 g away from a pubic hair?
>>
>>
>
> The adjacent orrifice

Ah, male or female one?

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:19:04 +1300, cowboyz <> wrote in
<news:cl9jln$t5d$>:

> DoggNZ wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:47:25 +1300, Chris Mayhew <no^^^@no.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone googled "wogger" (i'm looking for a distintive
>>> domainname) I don't think I'd want to be named after pubic hair
>>>
>>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...r&defid=350986
>>
>> I thought this was some mispelt reference to Woger but that was much
>> funnier.
>
> So you are saying Woger is 1 g away from a pubic hair?

More like a year away from his first one, I'd say.

--
Regards,
Nicolaas.


- The more we learn, the more we discover how ignorant we are. Wisdom
lies in surviving this.

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:54:37 +1300, Gordon <> wrote in
<news>:

> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:26:10 +1300, nick wrote:
>
>>
>> "cowboyz" <> wrote in message
>> news:cl9jln$t5d$...
>>> DoggNZ wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:47:25 +1300, Chris Mayhew <no^^^@no.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone googled "wogger" (i'm looking for a distintive
>>>>> domainname) I don't think I'd want to be named after pubic hair
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...r&defid=350986
>>>>
>>>> I thought this was some mispelt reference to Woger but that was much
>>>> funnier.
>>>
>>> So you are saying Woger is 1 g away from a pubic hair?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The adjacent orrifice
>
> Ah, male or female one?

.... and is that orificial?

--
Regards,
Nicolaas.


- No good deed goes unpunished.

"Nicolaas Hawkins" <> wrote in message
news:1m5ajbybzq49$.xp8vwqs59zqe$....
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:19:04 +1300, cowboyz <> wrote in
> <news:cl9jln$t5d$>:
>
>> DoggNZ wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:47:25 +1300, Chris Mayhew <no^^^@no.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Has anyone googled "wogger" (i'm looking for a distintive
>>>> domainname) I don't think I'd want to be named after pubic hair
>>>>
>>>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...r&defid=350986
>>>
>>> I thought this was some mispelt reference to Woger but that was much
>>> funnier.
>>
>> So you are saying Woger is 1 g away from a pubic hair?
>
> More like a year away from his first one, I'd say.
>

Urrrrrrrghhhh
Queasiness, please stop.

nick wrote:
> "Nicolaas Hawkins" <> wrote in message
> news:1m5ajbybzq49$.xp8vwqs59zqe$....
>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:19:04 +1300, cowboyz <> wrote in
>> <news:cl9jln$t5d$>:
>>
>>> DoggNZ wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:47:25 +1300, Chris Mayhew <no^^^@no.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone googled "wogger" (i'm looking for a distintive
>>>>> domainname) I don't think I'd want to be named after pubic hair
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...r&defid=350986
>>>>
>>>> I thought this was some mispelt reference to Woger but that was
>>>> much funnier.
>>>
>>> So you are saying Woger is 1 g away from a pubic hair?
>>
>> More like a year away from his first one, I'd say.
>>
>
> Urrrrrrrghhhh
> Queasiness, please stop.

LOL, you're lucky I deleted the post I had written to add to this thread. I
just decided I shouldn't post it. Way too perverted for such an
upstanding group as nz.comp. Also I would have been threatened with sue-age
for slander. <g>.
--
~misfit~

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:03:47 +1300, nick <> wrote in
<news:_Beed.13487$>:

> "Nicolaas Hawkins" <> wrote in message
> news:1m5ajbybzq49$.xp8vwqs59zqe$....
>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:19:04 +1300, cowboyz <> wrote in
>> <news:cl9jln$t5d$>:
>>
>>> DoggNZ wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:47:25 +1300, Chris Mayhew <no^^^@no.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone googled "wogger" (i'm looking for a distintive
>>>>> domainname) I don't think I'd want to be named after pubic hair
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...r&defid=350986
>>>>
>>>> I thought this was some mispelt reference to Woger but that was much
>>>> funnier.
>>>
>>> So you are saying Woger is 1 g away from a pubic hair?
>>
>> More like a year away from his first one, I'd say.
>>
>
> Urrrrrrrghhhh
> Queasiness, please stop.

<cackle>

--
Regards,
Nicolaas.


- Often we don't appreciate what we have until we lose it. Don't wait for
that to happen.