On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:56:31 +1200, "TmcT" <>
wrote:
>Do they really need "chinese interface" ?
He is 69, she 65. They were professional in Beijing, she a
metallurgist, he an engineer so they are quite bright but their
English is limited and they are not too familiar with computers. They
will want to send Chinese language emails and maybe print letters to
friends. The Chinese interface was their daughter's idea (she lives
in Germany), but maybe it's not necessary.
>And how they going to typing chinese?
I think you can enable Chinese input on a US layout keyboard, they use
multiple keys - but I know very little about it. I think the
characters are 16 bits each rather than the 8 in western languages -
there are 2-3000 characters in the Chinese script.
>Here's some "add-on" programs for using Chinese under Windows (Eng).
>http://www.njstar.com/
>
>Some computer stores may selling Chinese Windows, such as, e-one, inc.
>
>Email me if help needed.
Thanks, I'll bear that in mind.
>Cheers
>
>
>"John Potter" <> wrote in message
>news:.. .
>> I am about to buy a laptop (windows) computer for Chinese friends who
>> want Chinese character interface. They will use it for email and to
>> read Chinese newspapers, probably not much else.
>>
>> I haven't owned a laptop but am familiar with desktop machines, so
>> firstly I would appreciate any comments on the differences. For
>> example I did once see a laptop which had a small partition with what
>> seemed like routines which on a desktop would be found in the bios
>> chips. Is this a common setup? Are there any other issues like this
>> which might trip up a person used to working with destop PCs? I will
>> be buying a new or not too old secondhand machine, I want to use
>> Norton Ghost on a separate partition in case of monumental suffup.
>>
>> Secondly, about the Chinese interface. Is this something added only
>> to windows, or does it have to be installed for each application? Can
>> I easily switch back to the western character set (I will be helping
>> them from time to time).
>>
>> Many thanks, John
>