«

look below they list these things as benifits, operating lifetime exceed
1000 hours... how low can you go thats like worse than a plasma screen
isnt it!!!


Any way what do you guys thing of this technolagy?

Daniel



From:
http://www.philips.co.nz/Information...elId=N234A2389

Polymer LEDs have several inherent properties that afford unique
possibilities, such as:
-All colors of the visible spectrum are available

-High brightness is achieved at low drive voltages/current densities

-No viewing angle dependence

-Operating lifetime exceed 1000 hours

-High response speeds allow display of high quality video

On Wed, 05 May 2004 09:26:43 +1200, Daniel <> wrote:

>look below they list these things as benifits, operating lifetime exceed
>1000 hours... how low can you go thats like worse than a plasma screen
>isnt it!!!
>



2 year they are utter Crap, keep well away from them..




>Any way what do you guys thing of this technolagy?
>
>Daniel
>
>
>
>From:
>http://www.philips.co.nz/Information...elId=N234A2389
>
>Polymer LEDs have several inherent properties that afford unique
>possibilities, such as:
>-All colors of the visible spectrum are available
>
>-High brightness is achieved at low drive voltages/current densities
>
>-No viewing angle dependence
>
>-Operating lifetime exceed 1000 hours
>
>-High response speeds allow display of high quality video
>

In news:,
The GHOST of WOGER. <> expelled:
>
> 2 year they are utter Crap, keep well away from them..
>
For once the CrapMark TM is appropriate


--
EMB
change two to number to reply

On Wed, 5 May 2004 22:55:10 +1200, "EMB" <> wrote:

>In news:,
>The GHOST of WOGER. <> expelled:
>>
>> 2 year they are utter Crap, keep well away from them..
>>
>For once the CrapMark TM is appropriate



Gee you agree with me for once..

In article <>,
The GHOST of WOGER. <> wrote:
>On Wed, 5 May 2004 22:55:10 +1200, "EMB" <> wrote:
>>For once the CrapMark TM is appropriate
>
>Gee you agree with me for once..

Nobody's perfect, Roger. Even you can be right sometimes.

--
Don Hills (dmhills at attglobaldotnet) Wellington, New Zealand

The GHOST of WOGER. wrote:

>>For once the CrapMark TM is appropriate
>
> Gee you agree with me for once..

Random babbelings will on occasion be correct....

Richard wrote:

> The GHOST of WOGER. wrote:
>
>>> For once the CrapMark TM is appropriate
>>
>>
>> Gee you agree with me for once..
>
>
> Random babbelings will on occasion be correct....
>
Monkeys > Typewritters > Time >>> Shakespeare