On 20 Feb 2004 17:57:28 -0800,
(Roger Ramjet)
wrote:
>Steve B.
>
>You are clearly an muppet.
>
>1> All companies will cut off a service for lack of payment.
>
After three days? As I say, if they got their act together and gave me
one bill a month (several years after the company was supposed to have
merged) the tiny (A5 size) ClearNet bills might not get overlooked
occasionally.
>2> Clearnet webmail retains messages for a month in the spam folder so
>that you can review the folder and to safegard against the deletion of
>legitimate emails.
It shouldn't take a month to do that; they could quite easily make it
fortnightly, or even weekly. Or (here's a bright idea) allow the user
to schedule it.
>Quite how you manage to attract 15mb (the limit) of
>spam a month is worrying enough.
>
Worries me too; but as I say below, I have eliminated the obvious
causes, AFAIK.
>3> You don't need delete ten messages at a time. Under the folders
>section you can click the trash can to the right of the spam folder.
>This will delete the entire folder.
>
Thank you for that hint. You saved me a lot of time.
>I haven't managed to attract even one spam message since joining
>Clear. But then again, I haven't "signed up" for any "free" services
>on the net.
Why should you assume I have? I agree, signing up for free services is
the act of a "muppet" I KNOW it attracts spam. I DON'T do it (other
than once, as deliberate spam-bait, from a pair of specially-created
addresses.)
See:
http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/...3?OpenDocument
OTOH there is NOTHING in the present state of the law and the
ludicrously insecure procedures on such sites, to prevent others
signing up on my behalf and without my consent.
The question of how much spam a particular person attracts and why is
something I periodically conceive the idea of conducting a poll on.
Shall we try it: now?
Some people do seem to get hardly any. Others, without a notable
difference in their behaviour, get loads of it.
I believe in my case, it may be because I have upset some
childish-minded people with my opinions. These people can read past my
(rather trivial) spam shield and "volunteer" me for "services" which
get me spam; maybe I'd better go for greater anonymity or use a spare
box for email replies to news posts (of which I get hardly any
anyway).
But perhaps there's some other hidden cause. I'd be grateful for
further hints (which do not insult my intelligence) as to how my
identity may be "leaking" out.
At present, approximately 80% of my email is spam. I repeat, I do NOT
spray my identity around websites, seeking free offers. I have munged
hidden email addresses in my browsers and use a browser and email that
are totally separate.
"Is there anything else I could have done and have not done?"
Improperia: Good Friday.
Steve B.