Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > NZ Computing > OSX vunerability

Reply
Thread Tools

OSX vunerability

 
 
T.N.O.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-01-2003
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/39/34240.html

"The vulnerability affects Mac OS X 10.2 and 10.3 on both workstation
and servers. Earlier versions of Mac OS X may also be vulnerable.

Carrel suggests a number of workarounds including preventing any network
authorisation services from obtaining settings from DHCP, as explained here.

A fix from Apple is not expected before next month at the earliest."

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Craig Shore
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-01-2003
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:19:45 +1300, "T.N.O." <> wrote:

>http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/39/34240.html
>
>"The vulnerability affects Mac OS X 10.2 and 10.3 on both workstation
>and servers. Earlier versions of Mac OS X may also be vulnerable.
>
>Carrel suggests a number of workarounds including preventing any network
>authorisation services from obtaining settings from DHCP, as explained here.
>
>A fix from Apple is not expected before next month at the earliest."


From the article on that www site, Posted: 27/11/2003 at 16:22 GMT

So it's next month already


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
T.N.O.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-01-2003
Craig Shore wrote:
>>http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/39/34240.html
>>A fix from Apple is not expected before next month at the earliest."


> From the article on that www site, Posted: 27/11/2003 at 16:22 GMT
> So it's next month already


heh, I only read it every couple of days... guess I should have checked
that before posting it, but I hadn't noticed anyone point it out.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Peter KERR
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-02-2003
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/39/34240.html
>
> "The vulnerability affects Mac OS X 10.2 and 10.3 on both workstation
> and servers. Earlier versions of Mac OS X may also be vulnerable.
>
> Carrel suggests a number of workarounds including preventing any network
> authorisation services from obtaining settings from DHCP, as explained here.
>
> A fix from Apple is not expected before next month at the earliest."


Wow, it's next month already

http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=32478

Which says effectively if you don't need it, turn it off.
AFAIK 10.0,1,2 came out of the box with it turned off.
Is it on as default in 10.3? or is this a case of
don't turn it on if you don't know what you're doing?

& while we're at it this one popped up:

http://www.security-corporation.com/...31124-001.html

This is a "feature" of Panther 10.3, sudo authentication from
the Finder. By default all members of the group "admin" gid 80
are added to /etc/sudoers. If you have "admin" users who you
wish not (for whatever reason) to sudo, you must edit
/etc/authorization (and /Library/Preferences/com.apple.desktopservices ?)
These procedures appear not to be well documented for
client desktops ...
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Webbrowser vunerability Skybuck Flying Windows 64bit 1 02-09-2011 09:16 PM
MS05-004: Path vunerability still present in ASP.NET 2.0 Richard Eke ASP .Net Security 7 03-08-2006 02:38 PM
FireFox (OSX): No in-page keyboard navigation? Daniel J. Stern Firefox 1 12-27-2004 12:15 PM
MS jpeg vunerability Jim Watt Computer Security 14 10-09-2004 07:48 AM
OSX/TB0.7.1 - no sound notification about new email look^ Firefox 1 08-26-2004 07:33 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57