Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > NZ Computing > Selling Stolen Property By Spam

Reply
Thread Tools

Selling Stolen Property By Spam

 
 
PC
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-13-2003
Ata boy Bruce

PC

"Bruce Simpson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Just in case anyone's interested, I caught one of the Net's biggest
> spammers stealing from Altavista and re-selling to anyone stupid
> enough to believe that spammers don't lie. AltaVista are not
> best-pleased but I'm sure lots of domain name holders who are
> regularly bombarded with this crowd's spam will be
>
> http://aardvark.co.nz/daily/2003/1015.shtml
>
> --
> you can contact me via http://aardvark.co.nz/contact/



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Bruce Simpson
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-14-2003
Just in case anyone's interested, I caught one of the Net's biggest
spammers stealing from Altavista and re-selling to anyone stupid
enough to believe that spammers don't lie. AltaVista are not
best-pleased but I'm sure lots of domain name holders who are
regularly bombarded with this crowd's spam will be

http://aardvark.co.nz/daily/2003/1015.shtml

--
you can contact me via http://aardvark.co.nz/contact/
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Gavin Tunney
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-17-2003
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:47:44 +1300, Bruce Simpson
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Just in case anyone's interested, I caught one of the Net's biggest
>spammers stealing from Altavista and re-selling to anyone stupid
>enough to believe that spammers don't lie. AltaVista are not
>best-pleased but I'm sure lots of domain name holders who are
>regularly bombarded with this crowd's spam will be
>
>http://aardvark.co.nz/daily/2003/1015.shtml


So what's the difference between Kevin Breedvelds post and this post
of yours Bruce? Aardvark is a commercial website whose income is
derived primarily from the number of people who visit it, and it seems
to me you're asking people to visit your (commercial) site here.

Gavin
 
Reply With Quote
 
Bruce Simpson
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-18-2003
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:36:55 GMT, http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/(E-Mail Removed) (Gavin Tunney)
wrote:

>On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:47:44 +1300, Bruce Simpson
><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Just in case anyone's interested, I caught one of the Net's biggest
>>spammers stealing from Altavista and re-selling to anyone stupid
>>enough to believe that spammers don't lie. AltaVista are not
>>best-pleased but I'm sure lots of domain name holders who are
>>regularly bombarded with this crowd's spam will be
>>
>>http://aardvark.co.nz/daily/2003/1015.shtml

>
>So what's the difference between Kevin Breedvelds post and this post
>of yours Bruce? Aardvark is a commercial website whose income is
>derived primarily from the number of people who visit it, and it seems
>to me you're asking people to visit your (commercial) site here.


Could it be that:

1. there are lots of threads on spam here so it's highly relevant

2. there is *no charge* for visiting my website and I sell nothing to
those who visit. Sure, there's some sponsorship but that's flat-rate
and I don't earn a single cent more when someone visits. It also
doesn't actually cover the costs of providing the service and likely
never will -- so that hardly constitutes a business does it?

3. I also contribute regularly here and sometimes like to start the
thread of a new discussion. Pointing out that their might be
something on my site that might worth discussing here is no different
to someone posting a link to a story on Wired.com, IDG.net or any
other publication. It's not like I post links to every edition I
write, in fact it's only very occasionally I post such links - and
then, only to those stories that I *know* readers here are likely to
be interested in.

Okay?

--
you can contact me via http://aardvark.co.nz/contact/
 
Reply With Quote
 
E. Scrooge
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-18-2003

"Gavin Tunney" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:47:44 +1300, Bruce Simpson
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >Just in case anyone's interested, I caught one of the Net's biggest
> >spammers stealing from Altavista and re-selling to anyone stupid
> >enough to believe that spammers don't lie. AltaVista are not
> >best-pleased but I'm sure lots of domain name holders who are
> >regularly bombarded with this crowd's spam will be
> >
> >http://aardvark.co.nz/daily/2003/1015.shtml

>
> So what's the difference between Kevin Breedvelds post and this post
> of yours Bruce? Aardvark is a commercial website whose income is
> derived primarily from the number of people who visit it, and it seems
> to me you're asking people to visit your (commercial) site here.
>
> Gavin


LOL
What exactly is Bruce trying to sell? I'm pretty sure that Bruce doesn't
work for a money grubbing low life outfit like Telecom/Xtra.
Your post is about as funny as the damn spam Jetstream tightly thottled
plans that Telecom send out with the phone accounts.
Looks like another damn Ape just fell out of his tree. Pay Per View
commercial website claim, what a joke.

E. Scrooge


 
Reply With Quote
 
T.N.O.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-18-2003
"Bruce Simpson" wrote
> >>http://aardvark.co.nz/daily/2003/1015.shtml


> >So what's the difference between Kevin Breedvelds post and this post
> >of yours Bruce?


> Could it be that:
> 1. there are lots of threads on spam here so it's highly relevant
> 3. I also contribute regularly here and sometimes like to start the
> thread of a new discussion.
> Okay?


I sniped two, but I get what you mean... I was going to say approx the same
stuff..


 
Reply With Quote
 
Gavin Tunney
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-18-2003
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 14:07:13 +1300, "E. Scrooge"
<(E-Mail Removed) (remove eye)> wrote:

>
>"Gavin Tunney" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:47:44 +1300, Bruce Simpson
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>> >Just in case anyone's interested, I caught one of the Net's biggest
>> >spammers stealing from Altavista and re-selling to anyone stupid
>> >enough to believe that spammers don't lie. AltaVista are not
>> >best-pleased but I'm sure lots of domain name holders who are
>> >regularly bombarded with this crowd's spam will be
>> >
>> >http://aardvark.co.nz/daily/2003/1015.shtml

>>
>> So what's the difference between Kevin Breedvelds post and this post
>> of yours Bruce? Aardvark is a commercial website whose income is
>> derived primarily from the number of people who visit it, and it seems
>> to me you're asking people to visit your (commercial) site here.
>>
>> Gavin

>
>LOL
>What exactly is Bruce trying to sell? I'm pretty sure that Bruce doesn't
>work for a money grubbing low life outfit like Telecom/Xtra.
>Your post is about as funny as the damn spam Jetstream tightly thottled
>plans that Telecom send out with the phone accounts.
>Looks like another damn Ape just fell out of his tree. Pay Per View
>commercial website claim, what a joke.
>


Web publishing sites actually are pay per view, it's just not the
viewer who pays. Advertising rates are dependent on the number of site
hits.... the more hits a site gets the more the advertiser has to pay.


Web publishers get their income from all sorts of sources such as
subscriptions, banner ads, linking, reprints etc.......but they are
all dependent on website hits. If you don't get the viewers you don't
get the income. For most publishers the actual content is just a means
of generating website hits which in turn generates income from
whatever sources they're canny enough to think up or latch onto.

But that's all academic here, Bruce has replied that Aardvark is a
non-profit organisation that loses money so obviously he derives his
income from other sources that are not allied to his website.

Gavin
 
Reply With Quote
 
E. Scrooge
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-19-2003

"Gavin Tunney" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 14:07:13 +1300, "E. Scrooge"
> <(E-Mail Removed) (remove eye)> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Gavin Tunney" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:47:44 +1300, Bruce Simpson
> >> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Just in case anyone's interested, I caught one of the Net's biggest
> >> >spammers stealing from Altavista and re-selling to anyone stupid
> >> >enough to believe that spammers don't lie. AltaVista are not
> >> >best-pleased but I'm sure lots of domain name holders who are
> >> >regularly bombarded with this crowd's spam will be
> >> >
> >> >http://aardvark.co.nz/daily/2003/1015.shtml
> >>
> >> So what's the difference between Kevin Breedvelds post and this post
> >> of yours Bruce? Aardvark is a commercial website whose income is
> >> derived primarily from the number of people who visit it, and it seems
> >> to me you're asking people to visit your (commercial) site here.
> >>
> >> Gavin

> >
> >LOL
> >What exactly is Bruce trying to sell? I'm pretty sure that Bruce

doesn't
> >work for a money grubbing low life outfit like Telecom/Xtra.
> >Your post is about as funny as the damn spam Jetstream tightly thottled
> >plans that Telecom send out with the phone accounts.
> >Looks like another damn Ape just fell out of his tree. Pay Per View
> >commercial website claim, what a joke.
> >

>
> Web publishing sites actually are pay per view, it's just not the
> viewer who pays. Advertising rates are dependent on the number of site
> hits.... the more hits a site gets the more the advertiser has to pay.
>
>
> Web publishers get their income from all sorts of sources such as
> subscriptions, banner ads, linking, reprints etc.......but they are
> all dependent on website hits. If you don't get the viewers you don't
> get the income. For most publishers the actual content is just a means
> of generating website hits which in turn generates income from
> whatever sources they're canny enough to think up or latch onto.
>
> But that's all academic here, Bruce has replied that Aardvark is a
> non-profit organisation that loses money so obviously he derives his
> income from other sources that are not allied to his website.
>
> Gavin


People post links to articles on Stuff and the Herald website all the time,
and that's no big deal either. Pretty large fish compared Bruce's low
budget website.
If Bruce was selling off useful products like cameras, cruise missiles, and
computers from his website, and advertising these retail goods for which he
hopes to profit from in the newsgroups - That would be quite a different
story.
Also each little hit to a website doesn't add up to being that much. It
would take thousands of hits to make any noticeable difference. I can't see
there being a big market for trying to get thousands of website hits from
the few people that post in this little group. Granted that Roger might
choose to visit the same website over a thousand times each day, but not
many sane people would bother to.
As far as Bruce's main sponsor goes, he most likely has a set deal with them
no matter how many people visit his website.

E. Scrooge



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spam-Spam and more Spam C A Preston Computer Support 2 04-12-2004 07:15 PM



Advertisments