«

Bruce Simpson <> wrote in
news::


> Of course if I was the kind of person who just loved watching
> programmes that are being shown for about the hundredth time in two
> years (Discovery), endless repeats of the same tired old moveis (Movie
> Channel), aged crap and piles of ads that I can get for free on FTA
> (Sky 1), etc, etc -- then I guess I would be fool enough to part with
> $70+ a month.

It always amazes me that some people can be so critical of what other people
spend there money on. Remember that not all Sky packages cost 70 a month,
some are a lot cheaper, and some people are actually quite satisfied with
what they get.