Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Cisco > Multilink PPP differences

Reply
Thread Tools

Multilink PPP differences

 
 
mikenipp@gmail.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-28-2006
Hello,

I am wonder what the difference between the two configurations below
are. It seems there are two ways to configure MLPPP. Either using a
multilink interface or a virtual template. One uses an unnumbered IP
and one uses a /30 for the multilink interface. I see in the QOS config
guids that you use option #2 for MLPPP interleave.

Which option is best practice for normal circumstances?

****Configuration #1****
multilink virtual-template 1
!
interface Virtual-Template1
ip unnumbered Loopback0
ppp authentication chap
ppp multilink
!
interface Serial0/0/0:1
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
no fair-queue
ppp multilink
!
interface Serial0/0/1:1
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
no fair-queue
ppp multilink


****Configuration #2****
interface Multilink1
ip address 10.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.xxx.xxx.xxx
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
!
interface Serial0/0/0
no ip address
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
encapsulation ppp
no fair-queue
!
interface Serial0/1/0
no ip address
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
encapsulation ppp
no fair-queue

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Charlie Root
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-01-2006
<> wrote in message
news: ups.com...
> Hello,
>
> I am wonder what the difference between the two configurations below
> are. It seems there are two ways to configure MLPPP. Either using a
> multilink interface or a virtual template. One uses an unnumbered IP
> and one uses a /30 for the multilink interface. I see in the QOS config
> guids that you use option #2 for MLPPP interleave.
>
> Which option is best practice for normal circumstances?
>


Since Multilink is statically configured, it's well suitable for leased-line
style connections. Virtual-Template is normally used in dial-like
environments on provider side where you have many users that need to share
similar configuration and you don't want to (or simply can't) configure each
user link individually. You can use PPP LFI with either of this approaches.
Also none of this scenarios forces you to only one addressing strategy - you
can use /30 with Virtual-Template (we do for some users) and you can use
unnumbered for Multilink interface.

Kind regards,
iLya


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
multilink ppp only works with ppp multilink fragment disable (2 T-1s) Karnov Cisco 1 05-24-2004 02:37 AM
Multilink PPP Smash Cisco 10 01-13-2004 01:57 PM
many lost fragments on ppp-multilink connections Gerd Thuemmler Cisco 0 11-27-2003 07:54 AM
Re: ppp multilink on 2500/3600 Klaus Kruse Cisco 1 10-27-2003 08:00 PM
ppp multilink lost many fragments Gerd Thümmler Cisco 0 07-11-2003 08:05 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57