«

who'sthat <> wrote in
news::

> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:57:40 -0500, chuckcar <> wrote:
>
>>who'sthat <> wrote in
>>news: m:
>>
>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:18:58 -0500, chuckcar <> wrote:
>>>
>>>>who'sthat <> wrote in
>>>>news: m:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:59:32 -0600, TJ <>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>who'sthat <> wrote in
>>>>>>news:a9o8j3tj921pdftogfccj84onpjugbg21d@4ax. com:
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Downloaded from the newsgroups.
>>>>> It's porn so if that's a problem don't download it.
>>>>> http://rapidshare.com/files/68526567...ob_1_.wmv.html
>>>>
>>>>Lets see a wmv porn file that won't give any video. What *are* the
>>>>odds? 100% with a name like that. The name is too general to be a
>>>>real upload. Nobody serious puts wmv files in usenet. The file has
>>>>been *deleted* by the uploader according to rapidshare. It was spam.
>>>>Live and learn.
>>>
>>> Bullshit. I uploaded it to RapidShare and killed it myself.

And exactly why did you only put it up for less than 1 day? Be honest
now.

>>> Other can view these files and there is NO DRM in it.
>>>

So you've said, but you (or they to be fair) haven't provided any
evidence or anything to back up what they claim, making that claim
questionable. You want a list? 1. When asked for the group, you didn't
provide it. 2. When given a method to find out the exact codecs required
for the file, you didn't use it. 3. When asked for a copy of the file,
you removed it before anyone could get it. 5. When asked if you knew if
your copy was good, you made claims of unidentified people who *say*
their copies are good. 6. When shown *why* it was spam, you deny it
without anything to back up your denial. If you want proof of what I
say, open alt.binaries.movies.french.xxx and look at any message posted
by or by miloch. That second you can find in plenty of
groups.
>>>
You've proved literally *nothing* here by definition.

>>You are rapidly becoming a useless troll. First you claim there's
>>nothing wrong with the file that *only* you can't view the file, and
>>when asked to produce the file, the file disappears. How is it that
>>you ignore *everything* asked to fix/find out the problem and still
>>make claims you can't/won't back up. These two whole threads are
>>pointless. Go complain to someone who cares (certainly no one here
>>does anymore).
>
> "the file disappears"
> I deleted it..it didn't disappear. I found out what I needed to find
> out from that. And from what you've said you wouldn't be of any help.
>
No, you simply ignored what I said because you couldn't be bothered.
*maybe* understandable given our past, but counterproductive to be sure
as I know what I'm talking about here.
>
> Please...ignore me from now on.
>
Tell you what. I'll make you a deal: I won't refute your methods in the
future and I'll withdraw my earlier criticism of your methods and in
exchange you will stop thinking you know everything about everything.
Certainly this last case you are not in a position to have that belief.


--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )