We are did the same in our outdoor wireless using Cisco 1310 bridge. Based
on our experience, you must have very clean distance between bridge and
bridge/repeater/AP. More repeaters, the single will be weaker and
un-reliable.
--
Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on
http://www.ChicagoTech.net
How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on
http://www.HowToNetworking.com
"Jim" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Can't be that specific as it is not going to be tied to one building.
>
> The laptops (six devices) will be anything up to 150 metres from the ship,
> with various obsticles inbetween eg walls, metal doors etc.
>
> That's why I am asking about repeaters etc.
>
>
> "Barb Bowman" <> wrote in message
> news
...
>> You need to be a lot more specific about distance, obstacles between
>> the ship and the building and define the actual number of
>> simultaneous wireless users.
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:52:01 +0100, "Jim" <> wrote:
>>
>>>We have a requirement to connect a number of notebooks in a building to a
>>>ship - wirelessly.
>>>
>>>The current proposal is to have a wireless bridge on the ship, bridging
>>>to a
>>>bridge on the ground. This bridge on the ground is then connected to an
>>>access point by cable and the notebooks connect to the access point.
>>>
>>>The access point maybe required to be a distance from the bridge due to
>>>the
>>>structure of the buildings - so that the access point can definately
>>>connect
>>>to the notebooks.
>>>
>>>I am not sure this is the best way. I don't want to run a cable from the
>>>bridge to the access point. I looked before at a repeater inline - with
>>>only
>>>using access points - but the signal was slightly un-reliable and we
>>>cannot
>>>afford this network connection to be unreliable.
>>>
>>>Any thoughts appreciated.
>>>
>> --
>>
>> Barb Bowman
>> MS Windows-MVP
>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/e...ts/bowman.mspx
>> http://blogs.digitalmediaphile.com/barb/
>
>